Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mahanta Jambigi" <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: hash socket only after full initialisation in smc_sk_init()
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:43:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814074345.F29311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813074315.554926-1-mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Data Race and Unsafe Publication leading to TOCTOU NULL pointer dereference in smc_diag_msg_common_fill
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net] net/smc: hash socket only after full initialisation in smc_sk_init() ---
commit 86b5da4b01196842fbdd925890a17242339aa010
Author: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>

net/smc: hash socket only after full initialisation in smc_sk_init()

This commit delays hashing the SMC socket to the end of smc_sk_init() to
prevent concurrent hash walkers from observing an uninitialized socket.

> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 00403175b7406..5e7560417ec70 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -409,13 +409,13 @@ void smc_sk_init(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, int protocol)
>  				      "sk_lock-AF_SMC", &smc_key);
>  	spin_lock_init(&smc->accept_q_lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&smc->conn.send_lock);
> -	sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
>  	mutex_init(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
>  	smc_init_saved_callbacks(smc);
>  	smc->limit_smc_hs = net->smc.limit_smc_hs;
>  	smc->use_fallback = false; /* assume rdma capability first */
>  	smc->fallback_rsn = 0;
>  	smc_close_init(smc);
> +	sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does moving the hash here fully protect
hash walkers from seeing uninitialized socket state?

Even with this change, the socket is still hashed inside smc_sk_init(),
which is called by smc_sock_alloc() before caller-level initialization
completes. For instance, in smc_create():

net/smc/af_smc.c:smc_create() {
    ...
	sk = smc_sock_alloc(net, sock, protocol);
	if (!sk)
		goto out;

	rc = smc_create_clcsk(net, sk, family);
    ...
}

Because smc_sock_alloc() hashes the socket, it becomes visible to hash
walkers before smc_create_clcsk() assigns smc->clcsock.

A similar pattern occurs in smc_clcsock_accept():

net/smc/af_smc.c:smc_clcsock_accept() {
    ...
	new_sk = smc_sock_alloc(sock_net(lsk), NULL, lsk->sk_protocol);
    ...
	(*new_smc)->clcsock = new_clcsock;
    ...
}

Could this expose the socket to a TOCTOU race in smc_diag_msg_common_fill()?

That function accesses smc->clcsock locklessly without READ_ONCE():

net/smc/smc_diag.c:smc_diag_msg_common_fill() {
    ...
	if (!smc->clcsock)
		return;
	r->id.idiag_sport = htons(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_num);
    ...
}

Since the compiler might reload the pointer after the NULL check, a
concurrent update to smc->clcsock (either during initialization or when
smc_clcsock_release() sets it to NULL) could cause a NULL pointer
dereference.

>  }
>  
>  static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813074315.554926-1-mjambigi@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  7:43 [PATCH net] net/smc: hash socket only after full initialisation in smc_sk_init() Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-14  7:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 11:04   ` Mahanta Jambigi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814074345.F29311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox