From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 08/13] s390x: sclp: Use sclp_feat_check directly to read DIAG318 feature bit
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:35:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824143740.291583-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824143740.291583-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
From: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
The additional entry in struct ReadInfo is only used to set sclp_facilities
where we are aware where these bits actually are in _read_info. So it is
more readable to directly check the bit here.
While at it order feat checks by byte and bit.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/sclp.c | 3 +--
lib/s390x/sclp.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index 1ffcf448..9d9fd3cb 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -157,8 +157,6 @@ void sclp_facilities_setup(void)
assert(read_info);
cpu = sclp_get_cpu_entries();
- if (read_info->offset_cpu > 134)
- sclp_facilities.has_diag318 = read_info->byte_134_diag318;
sclp_facilities.has_sop = sclp_feat_check(80, SCLP_FEAT_80_BIT_SOP);
sclp_facilities.has_gsls = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_GSLS);
sclp_facilities.has_esop = sclp_feat_check(85, SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_ESOP);
@@ -168,6 +166,7 @@ void sclp_facilities_setup(void)
sclp_facilities.has_esca = sclp_feat_check(116, SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA);
sclp_facilities.has_ibs = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS);
sclp_facilities.has_pfmfi = sclp_feat_check(117, SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI);
+ sclp_facilities.has_diag318 = sclp_feat_check(134, SCLP_FEAT_134_BIT_DIAG318);
for (i = 0; i < read_info->entries_cpu; i++, cpu++) {
/*
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index 42a2f2e9..87af429b 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct sclp_facilities {
#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA 4
#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI 1
#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS 2
+#define SCLP_FEAT_134_BIT_DIAG318 0
typedef struct ReadInfo {
SCCBHeader h;
@@ -169,8 +170,6 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
uint8_t _reserved5[124 - 122]; /* 122-123 */
uint32_t hmfai;
uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128]; /* 128-133 */
- uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
- uint8_t : 7;
/*
* At the end of the ReadInfo, there are also the CPU entries (see
* struct CPUEntry). When the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) feature is
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 14:35 [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/13] s390x: stflei test, fixes and sie lib rework Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 01/13] lib: s390x: Add function to get page root Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 02/13] lib: s390x: sie: Allocate physical guest memory via memalign Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 03/13] lib: s390x: sie: Memory rework Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 04/13] lib: s390x: snippet: Add function to create a guest of specific length Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 05/13] s390x: snippets: Add reset_guest() to lib Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 06/13] s390x: sclp: Remove unnecessary padding from struct sclp_facilities Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 07/13] s390x: sclp: Check sclp byte before reading feature bits Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 09/13] s390x: sclp: Add detection of alternate STFLE facilities Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 10/13] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 11/13] s390x: stsi: regression test for the STSI 3.2.2 count clamp Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 12/13] s390x: unittests: Reenable tcg for migration tests Janosch Frank
2026-08-24 14:35 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 13/13] s390x: skey: Fence TCG protection checks Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824143740.291583-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox