Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mikhail Zaslonko" <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/debug: Fix race between debug area resize and event logging
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:21:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903132123.12F271F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903130733.709001-4-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting NULL pointer dereference in debug_info_copy() if debug_register_static() fails to allocate memory.
--

commit 1749ca122b22e4769c7efc7f4a52046777b678ef
Author: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>

s390/debug: Fix race between debug area resize and event logging

Trace functions check for non-NULL id->areas without lock to minimize
overhead. This opens a race window where a NULL pointer dereference
occurs if id->areas is set to NULL after the check and before id->lock
is taken. This commit fixes the race by rechecking id->areas under lock.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c b/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
> index cf411f203571b..b5bf8284dbfc8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1663,9 +1673,11 @@ static void debug_flush(debug_info_t *id, int area)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i, j;
>  
> -	if (!id || !id->areas)
> +	if (!id)
>  		return;
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&id->lock, flags);
> +	if (!id->areas)
> +		goto out;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but I noticed a potential NULL
pointer dereference in debug_info_copy() if debug_register_static() fails
to allocate memory.

In arch/s390/kernel/debug.c:debug_register_static(), if the allocation fails:

	if (!copy) {
		pr_err("Registering debug feature %s failed\n", id->name);

		/* Clear pointers to prevent tracing into released initdata. */
		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&id->lock, flags);
		id->areas = NULL;
		id->active_pages = NULL;
		id->active_entries = NULL;
		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&id->lock, flags);

		return;
	}

This sets id->areas to NULL but leaves id->pages_per_area and id->nr_areas
with their original EARLY_PAGES and EARLY_AREAS values.

Later, if debug_info_copy() is called when a user accesses the exposed
debugfs file:

	for (i = 0; i < in->nr_areas; i++) {
		for (j = 0; j < in->pages_per_area; j++)
			memcpy(rc->areas[i][j], in->areas[i][j], PAGE_SIZE);

Will this cause a NULL pointer dereference when accessing in->areas[i][j]
since in->areas is NULL but the loop still executes based on in->nr_areas?
Should we reset id->pages_per_area and id->nr_areas to 0 on the error path
in debug_register_static(), or add a NULL check in debug_info_copy()?

>  	if (area == DEBUG_FLUSH_ALL) {
>  		id->active_area = 0;
>  		memset(id->active_entries, 0, id->nr_areas * sizeof(int));
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903130733.709001-1-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 13:07 [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/debug: Fix several s390dbf issues reported by AI scan Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-09-03 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] s390/debug: Fix NULL pointer dereference in debug_set_level() Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-09-03 13:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] s390/debug: Do not repeat parameter override notice on debug_set_level() Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-09-03 13:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/debug: Fix race between debug area resize and event logging Mikhail Zaslonko
2026-09-03 13:21   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] s390/debug: Fix several s390dbf issues reported by AI scan Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903132123.12F271F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox