From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Karl Mehltretter" <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] virtio_input: stop callbacks before unregistering input device
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 15:33:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905153357.7FE5E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905152059.89560-3-kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing `virtio_reset_device()` in the error path of `virtinput_probe()` before deleting virtqueues, potentially leading to use-after-free or memory corruption by the active hardware/hypervisor.
- [High] The driver leaks DMA mappings for unconsumed buffers in the event virtqueue (`vi->evt`) upon device removal or suspend/freeze.
--
commit 71bbbcca0b03e3c67fa905a8357e9d3ad23e7fe4
Author: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
virtio_input: stop callbacks before unregistering input device
virtinput_remove() unregisters the input device before resetting the
virtio device. virtinput_recv_events() drops vi->lock around input_event(),
so clearing vi->ready does not stop a callback that passed the entry check.
It can still use vi->idev, requeue buffers and kick the queue.
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c
> index deec24e8e6828..7b654af0a42cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -350,8 +353,9 @@ static void virtinput_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> vi->ready = false;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vi->lock, flags);
>
> - input_unregister_device(vi->idev);
> + /* Callbacks use vi->idev. */
> virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> + input_unregister_device(vi->idev);
> while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vi->sts)) != NULL)
> kfree(buf);
> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this cleanup leak DMA mappings for
the event virtqueue (vi->evt)?
The cleanup loop correctly detaches and unmaps vi->sts using
virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(), but it ignores vi->evt. Since
virtinput_fill_evt() populates vi->evt with buffers using
virtqueue_add_inbuf_cache_clean(), which establishes DMA mappings under
the hood, omitting the detachment step leaves these mappings active.
Does this result in a persistent DMA mapping leak every time the device is
unbound? Furthermore, since the memory for these buffers (vi->evts) is freed,
does this leave active DMA mappings pointing to freed memory, posing a memory
corruption risk if delayed DMA occurs?
Does this exact same DMA mapping leak also occur during the power management
suspend cycle in virtinput_freeze() which performs the same cleanup?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but is there a missing
virtio_reset_device() in the error path of virtinput_probe()?
Looking at virtinput_probe(), the device is marked as ready:
drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c:virtinput_probe() {
...
virtio_device_ready(vdev);
vi->ready = true;
err = input_register_device(vi->idev);
if (err)
goto err_input_register;
...
}
If input_register_device() fails, the error path deletes the virtqueues:
drivers/virtio/virtio_input.c:virtinput_probe() {
...
err_input_alloc:
vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
...
}
Since virtio_device_ready() sets the device status to DRIVER_OK and enables
the host/hardware to start processing virtqueues, does deleting the active
virtqueue structures without first calling virtio_reset_device() to halt
the device risk a use-after-free or memory corruption by the host backend
if it continues to access the freed vring memory?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260905152059.89560-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 15:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] virtio: synchronize callbacks during device reset Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-05 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-05 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] virtio_input: stop callbacks before unregistering input device Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-05 15:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-05 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] virtio: implement synchronize_cbs for remaining transports Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-05 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260905153357.7FE5E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox