From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
ojeda@kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/24] x86/vdso: Enable the vdsocheck tool
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 07:00:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908070037.B73541F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-vdso-absolute-reloc-v5-13-3a93791af1cf@linutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The AllowedRelocations list for EM_386 is missing bindings::R_386_PLT32, which can cause valid 32-bit VDSO builds to fail.
--
commit d74c76b651e13f383612ff619529355d8cc73129
Author: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
x86/vdso: Enable the vdsocheck tool
The vdsocheck tool validates the object files and final .so library
and detects incompatible relocations. This commit wires it up for the
x86 architecture.
> diff --git a/lib/vdso/check/vdsocheck.rs b/lib/vdso/check/vdsocheck.rs
> index f4c0730bc976d..1174d896a68b9 100644
> --- a/lib/vdso/check/vdsocheck.rs
> +++ b/lib/vdso/check/vdsocheck.rs
> @@ -34,6 +34,20 @@ fn is_ignored_section(&self, section: &elf::Section<'_>) -> bool {
>
> fn allowed_relocations_for_machine(machine: u16) -> Option<AllowedRelocations<'static>> {
> match machine as u32 {
> + bindings::EM_386 => AllowedRelocations {
> + in_object_file: &[
> + bindings::R_386_PC32,
> + bindings::R_386_GOTOFF,
> + bindings::R_386_GOTPC,
> + ],
[Severity: Low]
Is the AllowedRelocations list for EM_386 missing bindings::R_386_PLT32 here?
The vdsocheck tool validates object files during the kernel build. If a
compiler generates R_386_PLT32 relocations for local function calls in PIC
code (which is common in many GCC versions), the build will fail because
this relocation is not in the allowlist.
For 64-bit VDSO (EM_X86_64), bindings::R_X86_64_PLT32 is explicitly allowed
just below. Additionally, the kernel's relocs tool treats R_386_PLT32 as
equivalent to R_386_PC32 because it is a standard PC-relative relocation
emitted by GCC for function calls.
Could omitting it from vdsocheck cause spurious build failures on valid
32-bit C code?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908-vdso-absolute-reloc-v5-0-3a93791af1cf@linutronix.de?part=13
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 6:33 [PATCH v5 00/24] vdso: Reject absolute relocations during build Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] elf, uapi: Add a header for relocation constants Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 9:00 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-10 6:31 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] x86/elf, um/x86/elf: Move relocation constants to UAPI Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-08 14:26 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 15:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-09 5:59 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-09 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-09 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-09-09 19:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-10 8:33 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 14:32 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] ARM: elf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] arm64: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] powerpc/elf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-08 14:01 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-09-10 6:30 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] riscv: elf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] LoongArch: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] s390/elf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] MIPS: ELF: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] sparc: elf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] tools headers UAPI: Sync ELF headers with the kernel sources Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 8:56 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-08 9:37 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 9:09 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] vdso: Add the vdsocheck tool Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-08 7:35 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-09 19:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-09-09 19:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-09-10 6:52 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] x86/vdso: Enable " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] ARM: vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] arm64: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] powerpc/elf: Add 32-bit REL16 relocation definitions Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 9:21 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-08 14:01 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] powerpc/vdso: Enable the vdsocheck tool Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 14:02 ` R Nageswara Sastry
2026-09-08 14:41 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-09-09 6:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] riscv: vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] LoongArch: vDSO: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] s390/vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] MIPS: ELF: Add more PC-relative relocation definitions Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] MIPS: vdso: Enable the vdsocheck tool Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] sparc: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 6:33 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] vDSO: Automatically enable VDSO_CHECK Thomas Weißschuh
2026-09-08 7:18 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908070037.B73541F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox