Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hidayath Khan" <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free()
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 11:47:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908114743.481841F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907114721.1303498-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Late-queued `tx_work` can execute on a freed socket because it does not hold a socket reference, causing a use-after-free.
--

commit ea8d2d358addfe3a2e07acf0170476ee1325ff01
Author: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>

net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free()

This commit addresses deadlocks, reference leaks, and late-queued work races
related to abort_work in smc_conn_free(). It drops the socket lock around
cancel_work_sync() and uses a freed flag to prevent late-queued work from
processing a destroyed connection.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260806081549.595001-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com/

> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> index 04aedd957543a..9a109eae73b92 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1276,8 +1295,7 @@ void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
>  			smcd_buf_detach(conn);
>  	} else {
>  		smc_cdc_wait_pend_tx_wr(conn);
> -		if (current_work() != &conn->abort_work)
> -			cancel_work_sync(&conn->abort_work);
> +		smc_conn_cancel_abort_work(conn);

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while fixing the exact same design flaw for
abort_work, does this leave tx_work vulnerable to a similar late-queue race?

If a local user closes an SMC socket, smc_close_cancel_work() cancels tx_work.
However, before the socket is fully destroyed, a remote peer sending a CDC
message (or a local user reading spliced data triggering
smc_rx_pipe_buf_release()) can cause the incoming message handler
smc_cdc_msg_recv_action() to call smc_tx_pending(). This can re-queue the work
after it was cancelled:

net/smc/smc_tx.c:smc_tx_consumer_update() {
    ...
    queue_delayed_work(conn->lgr->tx_wq, &conn->tx_work, SMC_TX_WORK_DELAY);
    ...
}

Because tx_work does not hold a socket reference, it can be queued late and
outlive the socket. If the socket destruction completes and frees the socket,
and then tx_work expires and executes, it will dereference the freed socket
memory:

net/smc/smc_tx.c:smc_tx_work() {
    ...
    lock_sock(&smc->sk);
    ...
}

Could this lead to a use-after-free if it is reliably reachable by a local
unprivileged user via splice() or by a remote peer sending timed CDC messages
during socket teardown?

>  	}
>  	if (!list_empty(&lgr->list)) {
>  		smc_buf_unuse(conn, lgr); /* allow buffer reuse */

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907114721.1303498-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 11:47 [PATCH net v2] net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free() Hidayath Khan
2026-09-08  3:22 ` Dust Li
2026-09-08 11:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09  6:48   ` Hidayath Khan
2026-09-10 10:50     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 11:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260908114743.481841F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox