Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: dengler@linux.ibm.com, fcallies@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com
Cc: freude@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/1] Fix and improve zcrypt reply message checks
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:05:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911130544.43484-1-freude@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Fix and improve zcrypt reply messages checks of type 6 - CCA and EP11
- and type 50 - ICA.

Changelog:
v1: Initial version
v2: Sashiko complained about not checking offset1/count1 at all if
    count2 for an CCA type6 reply is given. And a check like this was
    in place before the rework. So now offset1/count1 is always
    checked and only if count2 is non zero offset2/count2 is
    additionally checked.
v3: Again Sashiko had some complains which let to a broader review of
    the reply processing functions. Especially the zcrypt_type50.c
    functions convert_type80() and convert_response() got slight but
    significant improvements - and also a mysterious BUG_ON has been
    removed.
v4: Again Sashiko had a complain about my restrictions are too
    tight. So now in convert_response_xcrb() the exact length
    verification is:
	case TYPE86_RSP_CODE:
		...
		if (reply->len < sizeof(struct type86_fmt2_msg) +
		    offsetof(struct CPRBX, cprb_ver_id) +
		    sizeof(msg->cprbx.cprb_ver_id))
			return -EINVAL;
		...
    thus postponing the final length check to the convert function
    (which does the job hopefully correct).

Harald Freudenberger (1):
  s390/zcrypt: Fix and improve zcrypt reply message verification checks

 drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype50.c |  95 ++++++++----
 drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_msgtype6.c  | 198 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 13:05 Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2026-09-11 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] s390/zcrypt: Fix and improve zcrypt reply message verification checks Harald Freudenberger
2026-09-11 13:19   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911130544.43484-1-freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox