From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] s390/chsc: Use kzalloc() for CUBs
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:15:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916121506.2BA6B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-s390-cio-ready-v3-1-39e4894637d6@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] s390/cio: kzalloc() breaks strict 4K page-alignment for CUB/ECUB DMA
--
commit 6b733741b98fcfa57ed4ac8655c793a212c8f4aa
Author: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
s390/chsc: Use kzalloc() for CUBs
This commit replaces the use of get_zeroed_page() with kzalloc() and
free_page() with kfree() for allocating and freeing channel measurement unit
blocks (CUBs) and extended CUBs.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/635405e4-9423-4a25-a6e7-e03c8ea0bcbe@redhat.com
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> index 9689f722c863c..60a4a7e6086ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> @@ -931,12 +931,12 @@ static int cub_alloc(struct channel_subsystem *css)
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < CSS_NUM_CUB_PAGES; i++) {
> - css->cub[i] = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> + css->cub[i] = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
[Severity: High]
Is it safe to use kzalloc() here when the s390 hardware strictly expects
4K-aligned page addresses for Channel Measurement Blocks?
When SLUB debugging or KASAN is enabled, kzalloc() can return a pointer that
is shifted away from the 4K page boundary due to padding and redzones. Since
__chsc_do_secm() passes these pointers to hardware which truncates the lower
12 bits:
drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c:__chsc_do_secm() {
...
secm_area->cub[i] = (__force dma64_t)virt_to_dma32(css->cub[i]);
...
}
Would this cause the hardware to DMA write to the start of the slab page,
potentially overwriting SLUB metadata or adjacent objects when channel
measurement is enabled?
> if (!css->cub[i])
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < CSS_NUM_ECUB_PAGES; i++) {
> - css->ecub[i] = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + css->ecub[i] = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
[Severity: High]
Does this allocation have the same 4K alignment requirement as CUB pages
above, and could it cause the same DMA memory corruption if the pointer is
not page-aligned?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916-s390-cio-ready-v3-0-39e4894637d6@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 12:03 [PATCH v3 00/13] s390/cio: replace page allocator calls with k[mz]alloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] s390/chsc: Use kzalloc() for CUBs Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] s390/chsc: Use kzalloc() for the SEI work area Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] s390/chsc_sch: Use kzalloc() for CHSC requests Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] s390/chsc_sch: Use __free(kfree) for synchronous " Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] s390/cio: Use kzalloc() for CHSC work areas Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] s390/cmf: Use kmalloc() for the CMB area Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] s390/idals: Use kmalloc() for IDAL data buffers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] s390/qdio_main: Use kzalloc() for the IRQ structure Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] s390/qdio_main: Use kzalloc() for the QDR Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] s390/qdio_setup: Use kzalloc() for QDIO buffers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] s390/qdio_setup: Use kmalloc() for the storage list Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] s390/qdio_setup: Use kmalloc() for the SSQD request Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] s390/scm: Use kmalloc() for SCM information Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-09-16 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] s390/cio: replace page allocator calls with k[mz]alloc() Heiko Carstens
2026-09-18 16:23 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-09-20 18:20 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916121506.2BA6B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox