From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexander Egorenkov" <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] s390/sclp: Introduce macro sclp_gds_for_each()
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 07:08:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917070850.B5E171F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917065824.2858737-2-egorenar@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] sclp: out-of-bounds read in sclp_gds_for_each() due to integer promotion
--
commit f292c3c2b28abf9088d99e5a8af81f738a00c9ee
Author: Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>
s390/sclp: Introduce macro sclp_gds_for_each()
This commit introduces a macro to iterate safely over GDS {sub}vectors. It
adds bounds checks to avoid infinite loops and out-of-bounds memory accesses
when parsing malformed event buffers.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp.h b/drivers/s390/char/sclp.h
> index b31a680e08714..d22003b769f14 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp.h
> @@ -360,25 +360,33 @@ sclp_ascebc_str(char *str, int nr)
> (machine_is_vm()) ? ASCEBC(str, nr) : ASCEBC_500(str, nr);
> }
>
> -static inline struct gds_vector *
> -sclp_find_gds_vector(void *start, void *end, u16 id)
> +/* Loop over all GDS {sub}vectors in a safe manner. */
> +#define sclp_gds_for_each(v, n, start, end) \
> + for ((n) = (end) - (start), (v) = (start); \
> + (n) >= sizeof(*(v)) && (v)->length >= sizeof(*(v)) && (v)->length <= (n); \
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce an out-of-bounds read due to integer promotion?
If a malformed SCLP event buffer is provided by the hardware with an
evbuf->length smaller than the header size, start will be greater than end.
This happens in callers like sclp_ocf_handler() and sclp_tty_receiver():
drivers/s390/char/sclp_ocf.c:sclp_ocf_handler() {
...
v = sclp_find_gds_vector(evbuf + 1, (void *) evbuf + evbuf->length,
0x9f00);
...
}
In sclp_gds_for_each(), the loop limit n is computed as (end) - (start).
Because callers define n as an int, if start is greater than end, n will be a
negative integer.
The bounds condition (n) >= sizeof(*(v)) compares the signed int n with the
unsigned size_t returned by sizeof. Due to C integer promotion rules, n is
implicitly promoted to an unsigned type, wrapping the negative value to a very
large positive number.
Consequently, the bounds check evaluates to true, and the loop mistakenly
executes (v)->length >= sizeof(*(v)), reading from the out-of-bounds start
pointer.
The original logic ((void *) v < end) handled start > end safely by
immediately skipping the loop.
> + (n) -= (v)->length, (v) = (void*)(v) + (v)->length)
> +
> +static inline struct gds_vector *sclp_find_gds_vector(void *start,
> + void *end, u16 id)
> {
> struct gds_vector *v;
> -
> - for (v = start; (void *) v < end; v = (void *) v + v->length)
> + int n;
> + sclp_gds_for_each(v, n, start, end) {
> if (v->gds_id == id)
> return v;
> + }
> return NULL;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917065824.2858737-1-egorenar@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 6:58 [PATCH v5 0/4] s390/sclp: Misc fixes Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 6:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] s390/sclp: Introduce macro sclp_gds_for_each() Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 7:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 9:49 ` Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 12:32 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-09-17 13:21 ` Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 6:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] s390/sclp_tty: Make use of sclp_gds_for_each() Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 6:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] s390/sclp_ocf: Fix computation of length of GDS values Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 7:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:50 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-09-17 6:58 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] s390/sclp: Ensure no callback gets called after sclp_unregister() returns Alexander Egorenkov
2026-09-17 7:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917070850.B5E171F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox