From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] s390/cmf: Fix virtual vs physical address confusion
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
The measurement block address is an absolute address. Define the
associated schib_config and schib fields as dma64_t to enable automatic
detection of incorrect assignments. Also add the missing virt_to_dma64()
translation.
Without this fix, a wrong address will be used by firmware when storing
extended format channel measurement data on kernels built with
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_IDENTITY_BASE=y.
Fixes: 14edd0d73bfe ("s390/cmf: fix virtual vs physical address confusion")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
---
v2:
- Change type of mba field from u64 to dma64_t
- Add fixes and cc-stable tags
drivers/s390/cio/cio.h | 5 +++--
drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
index bad142c536e1..e0a6b4663ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <asm/chpid.h>
#include <asm/cio.h>
+#include <asm/dma-types.h>
#include <asm/fcx.h>
#include <asm/schid.h>
#include <asm/tpi.h>
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ struct pmcw {
/* Target SCHIB configuration. */
struct schib_config {
- u64 mba;
+ dma64_t mba;
u32 intparm;
u16 mbi;
u32 isc:3;
@@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ struct schib_config {
struct schib {
struct pmcw pmcw; /* path management control word */
union scsw scsw; /* subchannel status word */
- __u64 mba; /* measurement block address */
+ dma64_t mba; /* measurement block address */
__u8 mda[4]; /* model dependent area */
} __attribute__ ((packed,aligned(4)));
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c b/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
index 8fd41a7dfc20..02b0feb9d1fd 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int set_schib(struct ccw_device *cdev, u32 mme, int mbfc,
sch->config.mbfc = mbfc;
/* address can be either a block address or a block index */
if (mbfc)
- sch->config.mba = address;
+ sch->config.mba = address ? virt_to_dma64((void *)address) : 0;
else
sch->config.mbi = address;
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 13:16 Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2026-09-21 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] s390/cmf: Fix virtual vs physical address confusion sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 15:23 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox