From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ajaykumar Rajappa" <ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:04:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924120423.6A7031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924115204.1090452-1-ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi: zfcp: payload capture artificially truncated in zfcp_dbf_san_in_els()
--
commit 041b21a7756415603296020fe0feb75f0060af3c
Author: Ajaykumar Rajappa <ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>
zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length
This commit prevents integer underflows when processing the status read
buffer payload length in zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_uss() and zfcp_dbf_san_in_els().
It validates that the buffer length reaches the payload area before
subtraction and skips scatterlist setup when the payload is empty.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -716,15 +717,20 @@ void zfcp_dbf_san_in_els(char *tag, struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf)
> (struct fsf_status_read_buffer *) fsf->data;
> u16 length;
> struct scatterlist sg;
> + const u32 pay_offset = offsetof(struct fsf_status_read_buffer, payload);
>
> if (unlikely(!debug_level_enabled(dbf->san, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_LEVEL)))
> return;
>
> - length = (u16)(srb->length -
> - offsetof(struct fsf_status_read_buffer, payload));
> - sg_init_one(&sg, srb->payload.data, length);
> - zfcp_dbf_san(tag, dbf, "san_els", &sg, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_ELS, length,
> - fsf->req_id, ntoh24(srb->d_id), length);
> + length = (srb->length < pay_offset) ? 0 :
> + (u16)(srb->length - pay_offset);
> +
> + if (length)
> + sg_init_one(&sg, srb->payload.data, length);
> +
> + zfcp_dbf_san(tag, dbf, "san_els", length ? &sg : NULL, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_ELS,
> + length, fsf->req_id, ntoh24(srb->d_id),
> + min_t(u16, length, ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC));
[Severity: Medium]
Does this artificially truncate the debugging trace payload for incoming ELS
frames?
When an ELS frame larger than 256 bytes is received while tracing is active,
passing min_t(u16, length, ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC) here limits the capture to
the first 256 bytes, discarding the remainder of the payload and potentially
losing important debugging information.
The commit message states:
"Payload capture remains bounded by ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC, preserving
existing trace behavior for valid status read buffers."
However, the previous code passed length directly as the capture length
argument, allowing zfcp_dbf_san() to write multiple 256-byte trace records
in a loop to capture the entire payload. Could this be updated to preserve
the original behavior of capturing the full payload length?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924115204.1090452-1-ajaykr@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 11:52 [PATCH v3] zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length Ajaykumar Rajappa
2026-09-24 12:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-24 12:24 Ajaykumar Rajappa
2026-09-24 12:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924120423.6A7031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ajaykr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox