From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] s390/vfio-ap: replace guest-reachable WARNs with ratelimited warnings
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:59:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925125953.DAFAA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925124551.665448-7-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] s390/vfio-ap: NULL pointer deref in vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources()
- [Low] s390/vfio-ap: format specifiers truncate DMA addr and corrupt log
--
commit bb0d1a9a828269662641d7a1b6f445a55a9d0e1d
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: replace guest-reachable WARNs with ratelimited warnings
WARN and WARN_ONCE macros in code paths reachable by a guest
can be triggered repeatedly by a malicious or misbehaving guest,
flooding the kernel log and potentially impacting system
stability. Replace all WARN and WARN_ONCE calls reachable from
the guest AP interrupt enable/disable and queue reset paths with
ratelimited warning functions.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index cd4a436c43194..4b6e64daed253 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
[ ... ]
> +static void report_gisc_unregister_failure(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> +{
> + if (q->matrix_mdev) {
> + dev_warn_ratelimited(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> + "APQN %02x.%04x: Failed to unregister guest ISC %c\n",
> + AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
> + q->saved_isc);
[Severity: Low]
Could this result in missing or mangled information in the kernel log?
The guest ISC is printed using %c, which will output a non-printable ASCII
character for the numeric value, rather than the integer itself.
> + } else {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("APQN %02x.%04x: Failed to unregister guest ISC %c\n",
> + AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
> + q->saved_isc);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool verify_free_aqic_resourcers(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> +{
> + bool verified = true;
> +
> + if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID &&
> + !(q->matrix_mdev && q->matrix_mdev->kvm)) {
> + report_gisc_unregister_failure(q);
> + verified = false;
> + }
> +
> + if (q->saved_iova && !q->matrix_mdev) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("APQN %02x.%04x: Failed to unpin NIB page %08x\n",
> + AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
> + q->saved_iova);
[Severity: Low]
Does this truncate the logged DMA address? q->saved_iova is a 64-bit
dma_addr_t, but it's being printed with a 32-bit format specifier %08x.
> + verified = false;
> + }
> +
> + return verified;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources - free vfio_ap_queue resources
> * @q: The vfio_ap_queue
> @@ -316,17 +398,13 @@ static int vfio_ap_wait_for_irqclear(int apqn, struct ap_queue_status *tapq_stat
> */
> static void vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> {
> - if (!q)
> + if (!q || !verify_free_aqic_resourcers(q))
> return;
> - if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID &&
> - !WARN_ON(!(q->matrix_mdev && q->matrix_mdev->kvm))) {
> - kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->saved_isc);
> - q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
> - }
> - if (q->saved_iova && !WARN_ON(!q->matrix_mdev)) {
> - vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, q->saved_iova, 1);
> - q->saved_iova = 0;
> - }
> +
> + kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->saved_isc);
> + q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
> + vfio_unpin_pages(&q->matrix_mdev->vdev, q->saved_iova, 1);
> + q->saved_iova = 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
Can this lead to a NULL pointer dereference or a memory leak?
In verify_free_aqic_resourcers(), the logic couples the validation of the two
independent resources. If both resources are empty (q->saved_isc ==
VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID and q->saved_iova == 0), the function returns true. If
q->matrix_mdev is NULL, vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources() will then unconditionally
dereference q->matrix_mdev->kvm, resulting in a kernel panic. This path can be
reached when an unbound queue is removed from the host AP configuration.
Additionally, if only one resource fails validation (e.g., kvm is NULL),
verify_free_aqic_resourcers() returns false, which skips the cleanup entirely.
This prevents the NIB page from being unpinned, leaking the memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925124551.665448-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 12:45 [PATCH v8 0/6] s390/vfio-ap: Fix pre-existing bugs in vfio_ap device driver Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] s390/vfio-ap: Fix leaks of pinned NIB and registered GISC Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 9:36 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] s390/vfio-ap: Fix failure to release IRQ notification eventfd contexts Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] s390/vfio-ap: Fix unbounded loop in apq_reset_check() Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 13:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 11:11 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] s390/vfio-ap: Use AP_DOMAINS for adm_add bitmap size in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_add() Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] s390/vfio-ap: fix queue state leakage to guest and host Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 11:41 ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] s390/vfio-ap: replace guest-reachable WARNs with ratelimited warnings Anthony Krowiak
2026-09-25 12:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-25 15:55 ` Anthony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925125953.DAFAA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox