From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexandra Winter" <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:53:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928115321.F12041F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928114741.4135978-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com>
> Sashiko reported [1] that 'Missing __GFP_ZERO in folio_alloc() causes
> uninitialized kernel memory to be exposed in the receive message buffer'.
> An ism dmb is receive-only, so the data is not leaked to a remote peer. In
> general the smc kernel module (dibs client) will only push newly received
> data to userspace. We still should not have uninitialized data in a receive
> buffer.
>
> Since
> commit 750afb08ca71 ("cross-tree: phase out dma_zalloc_coherent()")
> dma_alloc_coherent no longer required the __GFP_ZERO flag, but when
> commit 83781384a96b ("s390/ism: Properly fix receive message buffer allocation")
> switched to folio_alloc(), it should have added back the __GFP_ZERO flag.
>
> Add __GFP_ZERO flag and state in dibs.h that register_dbm() provides
> a zerorized buffer (dibs_lo already does).
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/20260903143746.A5CC41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/ [1]
> Fixes: 83781384a96b ("s390/ism: Properly fix receive message buffer allocation")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928114741.4135978-1-wintera@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 11:47 [PATCH net] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation Alexandra Winter
2026-09-28 11:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-30 0:51 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260928115321.F12041F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox