From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] MIPS: Initialize sbm topology on multi-node systems
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:13:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002091322.2AA701F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001192849.74788-6-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] mips: modpost section mismatch from cpu_node_probe() calling __init function
--
commit a182a04b59c7d5076dc4fa89322bc392b7a56f93
Author: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
MIPS: Initialize sbm topology on multi-node systems
For MIPS systems that support NUMA, configure the sparsebitmap (sbm)
topology.
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> index 9429d85a4703c..bb6d14bfe5ebb 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c
> [ ... ]
> @@ -5,9 +5,52 @@
> #include <linux/node.h>
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/sbm.h>
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +/* sbm setup data - only needed during init */
> +static struct cpumask cpu_sbm_setup_map __initdata;
> +static int __node_thread_count[NR_CPUS] __initdata;
> +
> +int arch_sbm_cpu_instance_id(int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpu_to_node(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +void __init configure_sbm_topology(void)
> +{
> [ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-smp.c b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-smp.c
> index 62733e049570a..244f8d987f13b 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-smp.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-smp.c
> [ ... ]
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ void cpu_node_probe(void)
> highest = node_scan_cpus(nasid, highest);
> }
>
> + configure_sbm_topology();
[Severity: Low]
Does this cause a modpost section mismatch warning?
Since configure_sbm_topology() is marked __init in
arch/mips/kernel/topology.c, calling it from cpu_node_probe() creates a
cross-section reference because cpu_node_probe() is not marked __init.
While cpu_node_probe() might only be called during initialization,
shouldn't it also be marked __init to prevent the .text section from
referencing the freed .init.text section?
> +
> printk("Discovered %d cpus on %d nodes\n", highest + 1, num_online_nodes());
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001192849.74788-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 19:28 [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] lib/sbm: Introduce helpers for architectures to configure LLC properties K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 5:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] drivers/base/arch_topology: Add support for initializing sbm topology K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] LoongArch: Initialize CPU _PXM relation for disabled CPUs from SRAT K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] LoongArch: Configure sbm topology during SMP preparation K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 3:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3.1 " K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] MIPS: Initialize sbm topology on multi-node systems K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] powerpc/setup: Initialize sbm topology based on coregroup / NUMA topology K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 14:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] s390/topology: Initialize sbm topology during topology_init_early() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 10:19 ` Mete Durlu
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] sparc64: Initialize sbm topology on multi-LLC system K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] x86/cpu/topology: Initialize sbm topology after topology parsing K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 8:27 ` Chen Yu
2026-10-04 6:17 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-07 3:52 ` [RFC PATCH v3.1 " K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] lib/sbm: Dynamically allocate sbm index when CPU is activated K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] lib/sbm: Add helpers to allocate, set, clear, and traverse the bits on sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] sched/fair: Allocate nohz.idle_cpus_mask during sched_init_smp() K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] sched/fair: Switch nohz.idle_cpus to use sbm K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 9:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] lib, sched: Introduce sparsebitmap (sbm) Chen Yu
2026-10-04 6:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002091322.2AA701F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox