From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>,
kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
wintera@linux.ibm.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net/smc: expose smc proto operations
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:33:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <208d87bd-3f4f-4d90-982e-fcc76dd5ed55@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <136a5e67-962a-4084-bc51-c0ec9eb8e885@linux.dev>
On 5/30/24 1:57 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> 在 2024/5/29 5:59, D. Wythe 写道:
>> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> Externalize smc proto operations (smc_xxx) to allow
>> access from files other that af_smc.c
>
> s/other that/other than ?
>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
Thanks for that.
D. Wythe
>>
>> This is in preparation for the subsequent implementation
>> of the AF_INET version of SMC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> net/smc/af_smc.c | 60
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>> net/smc/smc.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> index 77a9d58..8e3ce76 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> @@ -170,15 +170,15 @@ static bool smc_hs_congested(const struct sock
>> *sk)
>> return false;
>> }
>> -static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = {
>> +struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = {
>> .lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(smc_v4_hashinfo.lock),
>> };
>> -static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v6_hashinfo = {
>> +struct smc_hashinfo smc_v6_hashinfo = {
>> .lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(smc_v6_hashinfo.lock),
>> };
>> -static int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> +int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash;
>> struct hlist_head *head;
>> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -static void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> +void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> struct smc_hashinfo *h = sk->sk_prot->h.smc_hash;
>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> * work which we didn't do because of user hold the sock_lock in the
>> * BH context
>> */
>> -static void smc_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
>> +void smc_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static int __smc_release(struct smc_sock *smc)
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_release(struct socket *sock)
>> +int smc_release(struct socket *sock)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struct net
>> *net, struct socket *sock,
>> return sk;
>> }
>> -static int smc_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>> - int addr_len)
>> +int smc_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>> + int addr_len)
>> {
>> struct sockaddr_in *addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)uaddr;
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> @@ -1649,8 +1649,8 @@ static void smc_connect_work(struct work_struct
>> *work)
>> release_sock(&smc->sk);
>> }
>> -static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> - int alen, int flags)
>> +int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> + int alen, int flags)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2631,7 +2631,7 @@ static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock
>> *listen_clcsock)
>> read_unlock_bh(&listen_clcsock->sk_callback_lock);
>> }
>> -static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
>> +int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2696,8 +2696,8 @@ static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int
>> backlog)
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *new_sock,
>> - struct proto_accept_arg *arg)
>> +int smc_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *new_sock,
>> + struct proto_accept_arg *arg)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk, *nsk;
>> DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
>> @@ -2766,8 +2766,8 @@ static int smc_accept(struct socket *sock,
>> struct socket *new_sock,
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> - int peer)
>> +int smc_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> + int peer)
>> {
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2780,7 +2780,7 @@ static int smc_getname(struct socket *sock,
>> struct sockaddr *addr,
>> return smc->clcsock->ops->getname(smc->clcsock, addr, peer);
>> }
>> -static int smc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>> size_t len)
>> +int smc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2818,8 +2818,8 @@ static int smc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock,
>> struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>> size_t len,
>> - int flags)
>> +int smc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>> + int flags)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2868,8 +2868,8 @@ static __poll_t smc_accept_poll(struct sock
>> *parent)
>> return mask;
>> }
>> -static __poll_t smc_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>> - poll_table *wait)
>> +__poll_t smc_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>> + poll_table *wait)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -2921,7 +2921,7 @@ static __poll_t smc_poll(struct file *file,
>> struct socket *sock,
>> return mask;
>> }
>> -static int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
>> +int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> bool do_shutdown = true;
>> @@ -3061,8 +3061,8 @@ static int __smc_setsockopt(struct socket
>> *sock, int level, int optname,
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
>> optname,
>> - sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
>> +int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>> + sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> @@ -3148,8 +3148,8 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>> int level, int optname,
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int
>> optname,
>> - char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
>> +int smc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>> + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
>> {
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> int rc;
>> @@ -3174,8 +3174,8 @@ static int smc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>> int level, int optname,
>> return rc;
>> }
>> -static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> - unsigned long arg)
>> +int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> union smc_host_cursor cons, urg;
>> struct smc_connection *conn;
>> @@ -3261,9 +3261,9 @@ static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock,
>> unsigned int cmd,
>> * Note that subsequent recv() calls have to wait till all splice()
>> processing
>> * completed.
>> */
>> -static ssize_t smc_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
>> - struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
>> - unsigned int flags)
>> +ssize_t smc_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
>> + struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
>> + unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> struct smc_sock *smc;
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
>> index 3edec1e..34b781e 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc.h
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,39 @@
>> extern struct proto smc_proto;
>> extern struct proto smc_proto6;
>> +extern struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo;
>> +extern struct smc_hashinfo smc_v6_hashinfo;
>> +
>> +int smc_hash_sk(struct sock *sk);
>> +void smc_unhash_sk(struct sock *sk);
>> +void smc_release_cb(struct sock *sk);
>> +
>> +int smc_release(struct socket *sock);
>> +int smc_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>> + int addr_len);
>> +int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> + int alen, int flags);
>> +int smc_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *new_sock,
>> + struct proto_accept_arg *arg);
>> +int smc_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>> + int peer);
>> +__poll_t smc_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>> + poll_table *wait);
>> +int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> + unsigned long arg);
>> +int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog);
>> +int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how);
>> +int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>> + sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen);
>> +int smc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>> + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
>> +int smc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len);
>> +int smc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>> + int flags);
>> +ssize_t smc_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
>> + struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
>> + unsigned int flags);
>> +
>> /* smc sock initialization */
>> void smc_sk_init(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, int protocol);
>> /* clcsock initialization */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 3:59 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] Introduce IPPROTO_SMC D. Wythe
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/smc: refactoring initialization of smc sock D. Wythe
2024-05-29 6:14 ` Tony Lu
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net/smc: expose smc proto operations D. Wythe
2024-05-29 17:57 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-30 2:33 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2024-05-29 3:59 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC D. Wythe
2024-05-29 11:12 ` Dust Li
2024-05-30 3:11 ` D. Wythe
2024-05-29 11:58 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-05-30 2:51 ` D. Wythe
2024-05-29 19:55 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-05-30 2:35 ` D. Wythe
2024-06-01 13:06 ` Simon Horman
2024-06-03 2:57 ` D. Wythe
2024-06-03 7:47 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=208d87bd-3f4f-4d90-982e-fcc76dd5ed55@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox