public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 204/205] s390/qeth: limit csum offload erratum to L3 devices
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:17:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29d7a908-10af-a83a-df2f-05cf1facf82c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108.113527.2242883926552730503.davem@davemloft.net>

On 08.11.19 20:35, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:34:16 +0100
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:16:26PM +0100, Julian Wiedmann wrote:
>>> On 08.11.19 13:00, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:50:24PM +0100, Julian Wiedmann wrote:
>>>>> On 08.11.19 12:37, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>>>> From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ Upstream commit f231dc9dbd789b0f98a15941e3cebedb4ad72ad5 ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Combined L3+L4 csum offload is only required for some L3 HW. So for
>>>>>> L2 devices, don't offload the IP header csum calculation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> NACK, this has no relevance for stable.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, I'll drop it.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have an idea why the centos and ubuntu folks might have
>>>> backported this commit into their kernels?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No clue, I trust they have their own reasons.
>>>
>>
>> I cant see centos backporting anything unless they were asked to do so.
>> And this really looks like a "bugfix" to me, why isn't this relevant for
>> any older kernel versions?
> 
> Yeah seriously, this looks entirely legit.
> 

I can assure you this doesn't fix any actual bug, and there's zero user
impact from _not_ having this patch.

      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191108113752.12502-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-11-08 11:37 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 204/205] s390/qeth: limit csum offload erratum to L3 devices Sasha Levin
2019-11-08 11:50   ` Julian Wiedmann
2019-11-08 12:00     ` Sasha Levin
2019-11-08 12:16       ` Julian Wiedmann
2019-11-08 12:34         ` Greg KH
2019-11-08 19:35           ` David Miller
2019-11-11  7:17             ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29d7a908-10af-a83a-df2f-05cf1facf82c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox