From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:34:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a46072c-ef97-40a4-9bb4-fe521232dea1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514-rm-bsca-v1-0-6c2b065a8680@linux.ibm.com>
On 14.05.25 18:34, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> All modern IBM Z and Linux One machines do offer support for the
> Extended System Control Area (ESCA). The ESCA is available since the
> z114/z196 released in 2010.
> KVM needs to allocate and manage the SCA for guest VMs. Prior to this
> change the SCA was setup as Basic SCA only supporting a maximum of 64
> vCPUs when initializing the VM. With addition of the 65th vCPU the SCA
> was needed to be converted to a ESCA.
>
> Instead we will now allocate the ESCA directly upon VM creation
> simplifying the code in multiple places as well as completely removing
> the need to convert an existing SCA.
>
> In cases where the ESCA is not supported (z10 and earlier) the use of
> the SCA entries and with that SIGP interpretation are disabled for VMs.
> This increases the number of exits from the VM in multiprocessor
> scenarios and thus decreases performance.
Trying to remember vsie details ... I recall that for the vsie we never
cared about the layout, because we simply pin+forward the given block,
but disable any facility that would try de-referencing the vcpu
pointers. So we only pin a single page.
pin_blocks() documents: "As we reuse the sca, the vcpu pointers
contained in it are invalid. We must therefore not enable any facilities
that access these pointers (e.g. SIGPIF)."
So I assume this change here will not affect (degrade) when being run as
a nested hypervisor, right?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 16:34 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: Set KVM_MAX_VCPUS to 256 Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-15 11:14 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: s390: Always allocate esca_block Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-15 11:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-15 13:07 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-15 13:15 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: Specify kvm->arch.sca as esca_block Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-15 11:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-05-14 17:34 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-15 7:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init Christoph Schlameuss
2025-05-15 11:26 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a46072c-ef97-40a4-9bb4-fe521232dea1@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox