public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3866ec66-d069-05ec-20d4-1df51823d977@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220628143100.3228092-4-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>



On 6/28/22 16:30, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The special case of the jailhouse hypervisor passing through individual
> PCI functions handles scanning for PCI functions even if function 0 does
> not exist. Currently this is done with an extra loop duplicating the one
> in pci_scan_slot(). By incorporating the check for jailhouse_paravirt()
> into pci_scan_slot() we can instead do this as part of the normal
> slot scan. Note that with the assignment of dev->multifunction gated by
> fn > 0 we set dev->multifunction unconditionally for all functions if
> function 0 is missing just as in the existing jailhouse loop.
> 
> The only functional change is that we now call
> pcie_aspm_init_link_state() for these functions but this already
> happened if function 0 was passed through and should not be a problem.
> 
> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20220408224514.GA353445@bhelgaas/
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/probe.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 2c737dce757e..a18e07e6a7df 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2662,8 +2662,13 @@ int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
>   			if (fn > 0)
>   				dev->multifunction = 1;
>   		} else if (fn == 0) {
> -			/* function 0 is required */
> -			break;
> +			/*
> +			 * function 0 is required unless we are running on
> +			 * a hypervisor which passes through individual PCI
> +			 * functions.
> +			 */
> +			if (!jailhouse_paravirt())
> +				break;
>   		}
>   		fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn);
>   	} while (fn >= 0);
> @@ -2862,29 +2867,14 @@ static unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus_extend(struct pci_bus *bus,
>   {
>   	unsigned int used_buses, normal_bridges = 0, hotplug_bridges = 0;
>   	unsigned int start = bus->busn_res.start;
> -	unsigned int devfn, fn, cmax, max = start;
> +	unsigned int devfn, cmax, max = start;
>   	struct pci_dev *dev;
> -	int nr_devs;
>   
>   	dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "scanning bus\n");
>   
>   	/* Go find them, Rover! */
> -	for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8) {
> -		nr_devs = pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * The Jailhouse hypervisor may pass individual functions of a
> -		 * multi-function device to a guest without passing function 0.
> -		 * Look for them as well.
> -		 */
> -		if (jailhouse_paravirt() && nr_devs == 0) {
> -			for (fn = 1; fn < 8; fn++) {
> -				dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
> -				if (dev)
> -					dev->multifunction = 1;
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> +	for (devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn += 8)
> +		pci_scan_slot(bus, devfn);
>   
>   	/* Reserve buses for SR-IOV capability */
>   	used_buses = pci_iov_bus_range(bus);
> 


Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 14:30 [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-28 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 12:40   ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-30 13:48     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 14:50       ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-11  8:52         ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-28 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] PCI: Split out next_ari_fn() from next_fn() Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 12:44   ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-28 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 12:47   ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-06-28 14:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390 Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 12:45   ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-01 14:42     ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-07-22 21:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-28 14:31 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-30 12:53   ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-22 21:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3866ec66-d069-05ec-20d4-1df51823d977@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox