public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:19:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <422d6b1d-d2be-4f78-a973-05a4316e62f3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250912122300.GA15517@p1gen4-pw042f0m.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>


On 9/12/2025 5:23 AM, Benjamin Block wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:33:00AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
>> On s390 systems, which use a machine level hypervisor, PCI devices are
>> always accessed through a form of PCI pass-through which fundamentally
>> operates on a per PCI function granularity. This is also reflected in the
>> s390 PCI hotplug driver which creates hotplug slots for individual PCI
>> functions. Its reset_slot() function, which is a wrapper for
>> zpci_hot_reset_device(), thus also resets individual functions.
>>
>> Currently, the kernel's PCI_SLOT() macro assigns the same pci_slot object
>> to multifunction devices. This approach worked fine on s390 systems that
>> only exposed virtual functions as individual PCI domains to the operating
>> system.  Since commit 44510d6fa0c0 ("s390/pci: Handling multifunctions")
>> s390 supports exposing the topology of multifunction PCI devices by
>> grouping them in a shared PCI domain. When attempting to reset a function
>> through the hotplug driver, the shared slot assignment causes the wrong
>> function to be reset instead of the intended one. It also leaks memory as
>> we do create a pci_slot object for the function, but don't correctly free
>> it in pci_slot_release().
>>
>> Add a flag for struct pci_slot to allow per function PCI slots for
>> functions managed through a hypervisor, which exposes individual PCI
>> functions while retaining the topology.
>>
>> Fixes: 44510d6fa0c0 ("s390/pci: Handling multifunctions")
> Stable tag?
> Reseting the wrong PCI function sounds bad enough.

That's a fair point. This is definitely broken for NETD devices 
(https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/linux-on-systems?topic=express-direct-mode). 
Will cc stable.

Thanks
Farhan


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-09-13  8:27   ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-15 17:15     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 18:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-16 20:00     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-19 18:17       ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-09-12 12:23   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-12 17:19     ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2025-09-16  6:52   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-16 18:37     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-17  6:21       ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-17 17:50         ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-17 14:48   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-17 17:22     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  8:39   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-15 17:42     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 10:59       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  9:22   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-15 11:42   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-15 18:12     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 10:54       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-13  9:04   ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-15 18:27     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  6:26   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-15 18:27     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=422d6b1d-d2be-4f78-a973-05a4316e62f3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox