public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: jaka@linux.ibm.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
	weiyongjun1@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add the max value of fallback reason count
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 22:05:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <439a499a-13ae-47e7-af54-3d9f064766af@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4213b756-a92f-4be9-951d-893f4a6590b4@linux.ibm.com>



On 2024/8/2 19:17, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02.08.24 04:38, D. Wythe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/24 7:35 PM, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>>> The number of fallback reasons defined in the smc_clc.h file has reached
>>> 36. For historical reasons, some are no longer quoted, and there's 33
>>> actually in use. So, add the max value of fallback reason count to 50.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   net/smc/smc_stats.h | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_stats.h b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> index 9d32058db2b5..ab5aafc6f44c 100644
>>> --- a/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_stats.h
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>   #include "smc_clc.h"
>>> -#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 30
>>> +#define SMC_MAX_FBACK_RSN_CNT 50
>> It feels more like a fix ?
>>
>>>   enum {
>>>       SMC_BUF_8K,
>>
> 
> Hi Zhengchao,
> 
> IMO It should be 36 instead of 50 because of unnecessary smc_stats_fback element and  unnecessary scanning e.g. in smc_stat_inc_fback_rsn_cnt(). If there is any new reason code coming later, the one who are introducing the new reason code should update the the value correspondingly.

I wonder if it is really necessary to expand to 50, since generally
the reasons for fallback in a machine will be concentrated into a few,
normally less than 10, so there is almost no case of using up all 30
reason slots.

Thanks!

> Btw, I also it is a bug fix other than feature.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wenjia

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-02 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-01 11:35 [PATCH net-next] net/smc: add the max value of fallback reason count Zhengchao Shao
2024-08-02  2:38 ` D. Wythe
2024-08-02 11:17   ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-08-02 14:05     ` Wen Gu [this message]
2024-08-05  0:55       ` shaozhengchao
2024-08-05  0:56     ` shaozhengchao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=439a499a-13ae-47e7-af54-3d9f064766af@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox