Re: [PATCH] s390/dasd: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros

[Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>]

On 7/16/2024 1:20 AM, Stefan Haberland wrote:
> Am 14.07.24 um 18:58 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>> On 7/1/24 03:57, Stefan Haberland wrote:
>>> Am 16.06.24 um 04:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
>>>> With ARCH=s390, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in 
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag_mod.o
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in 
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd_mod.o
>>>> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in 
>>>> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba_mod.o
>>>>
>>>> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> I still don't see this in linux-next. Does your tree feed into 
>> linux-next, or will it go into Linus' tree during the merge window?
>>
>> Hoping to have these warnings fixed tree-wide in 6.11
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> The DASD patches usually go upstream through the linux-block tree. I 
> have sent them yesterday and Jens already applied them.
> 

thanks!