public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: mm: Fix secure storage access exception handling
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:38:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4de19c74-65dc-5a29-76c7-99c600012fdf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1978c6-4462-1de6-e1aa-e664ffa633c1@de.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1935 bytes --]

On 1/19/21 11:25 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19.01.21 11:04, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Turns out that the bit 61 in the TEID is not always 1 and if that's
>> the case the address space ID and the address are
>> unpredictable. Without an address and it's address space ID we can't
>> export memory and hence we can only send a SIGSEGV to the process or
>> panic the kernel depending on who caused the exception.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> Fixes: 084ea4d611a3d ("s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Thanks!

> 
> some small things to consider (or to reject)
> 
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
>> index e30c7c781172..5442937e5b4b 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -791,6 +791,20 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  	struct page *page;
>>  	int rc;
>>  
>> +	/* There are cases where we don't have a TEID. */
>> +	if (!(regs->int_parm_long & 0x4)) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Userspace could for example try to execute secure
>> +		 * storage and trigger this. We should tell it that it
>> +		 * shouldn't do that.
> 
> Maybe something like
> 		/*
> 		 * when this happens, userspace did something that it
> 		 * was not supposed to do, e.g. branching into secure
> 		 * secure memory. Trigger a segmentation fault.
>> +		 */

Sounds good

>> +		if (user_mode(regs)) {
>> +			send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
>> +			return;
>> +		} else
>> +			panic("Unexpected PGM 0x3d with TEID bit 61=0");
> 
> use BUG instead of panic? That would kill this process, but it allows
> people to maybe save unaffected data.

That would make sense, will do

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP_0xE354E6B8E238B9F8.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 7995 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 10:04 [PATCH 0/2] s390: uv: small UV fixes Janosch Frank
2021-01-19 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] s390: uv: Fix sysfs max number of VCPUs reporting Janosch Frank
2021-01-19 10:11   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-19 10:15     ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-19 10:19       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-19 13:11   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-01-19 16:19   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-01-19 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390: mm: Fix secure storage access exception handling Janosch Frank
2021-01-19 10:25   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-19 10:38     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-01-19 16:24       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-01-20 13:42     ` Heiko Carstens
2021-01-20 14:39       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-20 15:24         ` Heiko Carstens
2021-01-19 13:09   ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4de19c74-65dc-5a29-76c7-99c600012fdf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox