From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
timmurray@google.com, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: process_mrelease: skip LRU movement for exclusive file folios
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 15:05:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4df23f32-c538-4755-a1c9-be8559a103a3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7g5g57jbll5joujbwjb4osqhdwqd4yzc54wmoi7ftx4a4chuax@xtxyljtqaodp>
>>
>> But we'd have to learn from Liam :)
>
> Yes, it will be a zero entry tree now.
>
> I left the flag to indicate that it's an unstable mm, not for faulting
> in but to be skipped in OOM events and process_mrelease since neither
> should bother doing anything in the window between the dup_mm() failure
> and the exit_mmap() window where the write lock was dropped.
>
> We can safely drop the flag now if you want to, because everything has
> to deal with an empty vma tree anyways - a race can occur between a call
> to unmap everything and the task seg faulting.
Thanks for confirming!
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The bottom line is the same. Make sure PF fails rather than silently
>>> provide potentially corrupted data.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ohh, you mean to add a new flag, right?
>>
>> We could do that as well, if it's of any help.
>
> I really think this goes back to the life cycle of the mm being somewhat
> difficult to figure out.
Agreed.
> I'm fine with another flag.
Right, alternatively we could just turn the unstable flag into a "OOM is hiding
in the bushes to reap this MM".
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 23:02 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim and add auto-kill Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: process_mrelease: expedite clean file folio reclaim via mmu_gather Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 21:24 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-27 22:04 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-24 21:56 ` Minchan Kim
2026-05-05 14:53 ` Alexander Gordeev
2026-05-08 21:56 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: process_mrelease: skip LRU movement for exclusive file folios Minchan Kim
2026-04-22 7:22 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-23 23:38 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:51 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 19:15 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 16:48 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 17:15 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 23:05 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 1:19 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 13:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 14:44 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-30 6:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-08 20:57 ` Liam R. Howlett
2026-05-11 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-29 21:41 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-30 14:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-29 21:42 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 19:26 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: process_mrelease: introduce PROCESS_MRELEASE_REAP_KILL flag Minchan Kim
2026-04-24 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-24 22:49 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-27 22:03 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-28 7:01 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-28 22:37 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2026-04-29 20:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-29 21:17 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-29 21:16 ` Minchan Kim
2026-04-27 20:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-04-27 22:52 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4df23f32-c538-4755-a1c9-be8559a103a3@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox