From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:27:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513ac5d3-c0ef-4b07-bce2-84fabab9fdb7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yt9dfrst7ew0.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
Am 01.07.24 um 09:25 schrieb Sven Schnelle:
>>>> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw = new_psw;
>>>> + if (!is_valid_psw(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw))
>>>> + return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
>>> Shouldn't the gpsw get updated with new_psw after the check? POP
>>> says "The operation
>>> is suppressed on all addressing and protection exceptions."
>>
>> Only for exception of the instruction but not for the target PSW.
>> POP says:
>>
>> The other PSW fields which are to be loaded by the
>> instruction are not checked for validity before they are
>> loaded. However, immediately after loading, a speci-
>> fication exception is recognized, and a program inter-
>> ruption occurs, when any of the following is true for
>> the newly loaded PSW
>
> Ok, sorry for the noise.
You can repend by doing a review and send an RB or other feedback :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-28 16:35 [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling Christian Borntraeger
2024-07-01 6:08 ` Sven Schnelle
2024-07-01 7:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-07-01 7:25 ` Sven Schnelle
2024-07-01 7:27 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2024-07-01 8:11 ` Sven Schnelle
2024-07-01 10:28 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-07-01 10:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513ac5d3-c0ef-4b07-bce2-84fabab9fdb7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox