From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] s390/MSI: Use standard mask and unmask funtions
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:29:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BFA056.1010507@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1407110942310.1620@denkbrett>
>> mask status except we know need not to cache it, like in
>> pci_msi_shutdown. So use the standard functions to replace
>> the local is safe.
>
> Patch applied! (I had to fix another inverted pair in struct irq_chip
> first.)
Thanks very much, I'm very sorry for my carelessness.
Thanks!
Yijing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 49 ++++++-------------------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> index 9ddc51e..f715031 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -48,13 +48,10 @@
>> static LIST_HEAD(zpci_list);
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_list_lock);
>>
>> -static void zpci_enable_irq(struct irq_data *data);
>> -static void zpci_disable_irq(struct irq_data *data);
>> -
>> static struct irq_chip zpci_irq_chip = {
>> .name = "zPCI",
>> - .irq_unmask = zpci_enable_irq,
>> - .irq_mask = zpci_disable_irq,
>> + .irq_unmask = mask_msi_irq,
>> + .irq_mask = unmask_msi_irq,
>> };
>>
>> static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES);
>> @@ -244,43 +241,6 @@ static int zpci_cfg_store(struct zpci_dev *zdev, int offset, u32 val, u8 len)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> -static int zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(struct msi_desc *msi, u32 mask, u32 flag)
>> -{
>> - int offset, pos;
>> - u32 mask_bits;
>> -
>> - if (msi->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
>> - offset = msi->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
>> - PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL;
>> - msi->masked = readl(msi->mask_base + offset);
>> - writel(flag, msi->mask_base + offset);
>> - } else if (msi->msi_attrib.maskbit) {
>> - pos = (long) msi->mask_base;
>> - pci_read_config_dword(msi->dev, pos, &mask_bits);
>> - mask_bits &= ~(mask);
>> - mask_bits |= flag & mask;
>> - pci_write_config_dword(msi->dev, pos, mask_bits);
>> - } else
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - msi->msi_attrib.maskbit = !!flag;
>> - return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void zpci_enable_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>> -{
>> - struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(data->irq);
>> -
>> - zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 0);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void zpci_disable_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>> -{
>> - struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(data->irq);
>> -
>> - zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 1);
>> -}
>> -
>> void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> {
>> }
>> @@ -487,7 +447,10 @@ void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>
>> /* Release MSI interrupts */
>> list_for_each_entry(msi, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
>> - zpci_msi_set_mask_bits(msi, 1, 1);
>> + if (msi->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>> + default_msix_mask_irq(msi, 1);
>> + else
>> + default_msi_mask_irq(msi, 1, 1);
>> irq_set_msi_desc(msi->irq, NULL);
>> irq_free_desc(msi->irq);
>> msi->msg.address_lo = 0;
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 2:08 [PATCH v3 2/6] s390/MSI: Use standard mask and unmask funtions Yijing Wang
2014-07-11 7:46 ` Sebastian Ott
2014-07-11 8:29 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BFA056.1010507@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox