From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, drjones@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: define UV compatible I/O allocation
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:57:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54e3ff71-073b-2c98-40b3-c5b575577cfc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c232520-dbd1-80e4-e3a3-949964df7403@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/21/21 10:46 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 1/21/21 10:13 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> To centralize the memory allocation for I/O we define
>> the alloc_io_page/free_io_page functions which share the I/O
>> memory with the host in case the guest runs with
>> protected virtualization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> lib/s390x/malloc_io.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/s390x/malloc_io.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/malloc_io.c
>> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/malloc_io.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 54124f6..89cb01e 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ M: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> M: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> M: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> R: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> +R: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>
> If you're ok with the amount of mails you'll get then go ahead.
> But I think maintainer file changes should always be in a separate patch.
You are right it was more an attempts to bring the Linux checkpatch to
be quiet but this would need more changes so.. we can discuss this in a
separate patch.
>
>> L: kvm@vger.kernel.org
>> L: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>> F: s390x/*
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/malloc_io.c b/lib/s390x/malloc_io.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..bfe8c6a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/malloc_io.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> I think we wanted to use:
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
yes
...snip...
>> +
>> +void free_io_pages(void *p, int size)
>> +{
>> + int order = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + assert(IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)p, PAGE_SIZE));
>> +
>> + if (test_facility(158))
>> + unshare_pages(p, 1 << order);
>
> I have a lib file in the making that will let you check UV features like
> test_facility(). When that's ready I'm gonna check for unshare here.
OK
Thanks,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 9:13 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/3] s390x: css: pv: css test adaptation for PV Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/3] s390x: pv: implement routine to share/unshare memory Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:20 ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-21 9:49 ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-21 9:52 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/3] s390x: define UV compatible I/O allocation Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-22 7:55 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:46 ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-21 9:57 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-01-21 13:02 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 13:43 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-21 13:47 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 13:56 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-21 15:47 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 13:48 ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-21 15:48 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 13:33 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/3] s390x: css: pv: css test adaptation for PV Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:35 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-21 13:25 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 9:57 ` Janosch Frank
2021-01-21 13:25 ` Pierre Morel
2021-01-21 12:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-01-21 13:25 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54e3ff71-073b-2c98-40b3-c5b575577cfc@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox