public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: Remove SAVE/RESTORE_STACK and lowcore fpc and fprs save areas
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:28:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7154a604-9b00-88f1-7fea-d52aad19edcb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210222085756.14396-8-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 22/02/2021 09.57, Janosch Frank wrote:
> There are no more users. At the same time remove sw_int_fpc and
> sw_int_frps plus their asm offsets macros since they are also unused
> now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c  |  2 --
>   lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h |  4 +---
>   s390x/macros.S           | 29 -----------------------------
>   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> index 2658b59a..fbea3278 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ int main(void)
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_NEW_PSW, lowcore, mcck_new_psw);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_IO_NEW_PSW, lowcore, io_new_psw);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS, lowcore, sw_int_grs);
> -	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS, lowcore, sw_int_fprs);
> -	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC, lowcore, sw_int_fpc);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS, lowcore, sw_int_crs);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW, lowcore, sw_int_psw);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_EXT_SA_ADDR, lowcore, mcck_ext_sa_addr);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index b8e9fe40..13e19b8a 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -103,9 +103,7 @@ struct lowcore {
>   	struct psw	io_new_psw;			/* 0x01f0 */
>   	/* sw definition: save area for registers in interrupt handlers */
>   	uint64_t	sw_int_grs[16];			/* 0x0200 */
> -	uint64_t	sw_int_fprs[16];		/* 0x0280 */
> -	uint32_t	sw_int_fpc;			/* 0x0300 */
> -	uint8_t		pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0304];	/* 0x0304 */
> +	uint8_t		pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0280];	/* 0x0280 */

Please rename to pad_0x280 now.

With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-22  8:57 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/7] s390x: Cleanup exception register save/restore and implement backtrace Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/7] s390x: Fix fpc store address in RESTORE_REGS_STACK Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/7] s390x: Fully commit to stack save area for exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 11:37   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-04 15:57     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/7] s390x: Introduce and use CALL_INT_HANDLER macro Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:58   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] s390x: Provide preliminary backtrace support Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:23   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-04 13:02   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: Print more information on program exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:24   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/7] s390x: Move diag308_load_reset to stack saving Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:26   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: Remove SAVE/RESTORE_STACK and lowcore fpc and fprs save areas Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:28   ` Thomas Huth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7154a604-9b00-88f1-7fea-d52aad19edcb@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox