From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>,
wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 10/11] net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:49:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72c046f3-1eb5-44f8-b32b-1ff6471943a2@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b3428f6-1fcc-4aba-80a0-0743c7c0c138@linux.ibm.com>
On 2024/3/21 16:12, Jan Karcher wrote:
>
>
> On 17/03/2024 11:05, Wen Gu wrote:
>> Since ghost sndbuf shares the same physical memory with peer DMB,
>> the cursor update processing needs to be adapted to ensure that the
>> data to be consumed won't be overwritten.
>>
>> So in this case, the fin_curs and sndbuf_space that were originally
>> updated after sending the CDC message should be modified to not be
>> update until the peer updates cons_curs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> net/smc/smc_cdc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
>> index 3c06625ceb20..bf5b214ec15a 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include "smc_tx.h"
>> #include "smc_rx.h"
>> #include "smc_close.h"
>> +#include "smc_ism.h"
>> /********************************** send *************************************/
>> @@ -255,17 +256,25 @@ int smcd_cdc_msg_send(struct smc_connection *conn)
>> return rc;
>> smc_curs_copy(&conn->rx_curs_confirmed, &curs, conn);
>> conn->local_rx_ctrl.prod_flags.cons_curs_upd_req = 0;
>> - /* Calculate transmitted data and increment free send buffer space */
>> - diff = smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_desc->len, &conn->tx_curs_fin,
>> - &conn->tx_curs_sent);
>> - /* increased by confirmed number of bytes */
>> - smp_mb__before_atomic();
>> - atomic_add(diff, &conn->sndbuf_space);
>> - /* guarantee 0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len */
>> - smp_mb__after_atomic();
>> - smc_curs_copy(&conn->tx_curs_fin, &conn->tx_curs_sent, conn);
>> + if (!smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy(conn->lgr->smcd)) {
>> + /* Ghost sndbuf shares the same memory region with
>> + * peer DMB, so don't update the tx_curs_fin and
>> + * sndbuf_space until peer has consumed the data.
>> + */
>
> Hi Wen Gu,
>
> move this comment above the if please. Two consecutive multiline comments are difficult to read here.
>
OK, will move comments above the if. Thanks!
>> + /* Calculate transmitted data and increment free
>> + * send buffer space
>> + */
>> + diff = smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_desc->len, &conn->tx_curs_fin,
>> + &conn->tx_curs_sent);
>> + /* increased by confirmed number of bytes */
>> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
>> + atomic_add(diff, &conn->sndbuf_space);
>> + /* guarantee 0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len */
>> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
>> + smc_curs_copy(&conn->tx_curs_fin, &conn->tx_curs_sent, conn);
>> - smc_tx_sndbuf_nonfull(smc);
>> + smc_tx_sndbuf_nonfull(smc);
>> + }
>> return rc;
>> }
>> @@ -323,7 +332,7 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv_action(struct smc_sock *smc,
>> {
>> union smc_host_cursor cons_old, prod_old;
>> struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
>> - int diff_cons, diff_prod;
>> + int diff_cons, diff_prod, diff_tx;
>> smc_curs_copy(&prod_old, &conn->local_rx_ctrl.prod, conn);
>> smc_curs_copy(&cons_old, &conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons, conn);
>> @@ -339,6 +348,27 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv_action(struct smc_sock *smc,
>> atomic_add(diff_cons, &conn->peer_rmbe_space);
>> /* guarantee 0 <= peer_rmbe_space <= peer_rmbe_size */
>> smp_mb__after_atomic();
>> +
>> + if (conn->lgr->is_smcd &&
>> + smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy(conn->lgr->smcd)) {
>> + /* Ghost sndbuf shares the same memory region with
>> + * peer RMB, so update tx_curs_fin and sndbuf_space
>> + * when peer has consumed the data.
>> + */
>
> Same as above.
>
OK, will do. Thanks!
> Thanks
> - Jan
>
>> + /* calculate peer rmb consumed data */
>> + diff_tx = smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_desc->len,
>> + &conn->tx_curs_fin,
>> + &conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons);
>> + /* increase local sndbuf space and fin_curs */
>> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
>> + atomic_add(diff_tx, &conn->sndbuf_space);
>> + /* guarantee 0 <= sndbuf_space <= sndbuf_desc->len */
>> + smp_mb__after_atomic();
>> + smc_curs_copy(&conn->tx_curs_fin,
>> + &conn->local_rx_ctrl.cons, conn);
>> +
>> + smc_tx_sndbuf_nonfull(smc);
>> + }
>> }
>> diff_prod = smc_curs_diff(conn->rmb_desc->len, &prod_old,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-17 10:05 [RFC PATCH net-next v4 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 01/11] net/smc: decouple ism_client from SMC-D DMB registration Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 02/11] net/smc: introduce loopback-ism for SMC intra-OS shortcut Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 03/11] net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-03-21 8:12 ` Jan Karcher
2024-03-22 1:37 ` Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 04/11] net/smc: implement some unsupported " Wen Gu
2024-03-21 8:12 ` Jan Karcher
2024-03-22 1:39 ` Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 05/11] net/smc: implement DMB-related " Wen Gu
2024-03-21 8:12 ` Jan Karcher
2024-03-22 12:30 ` Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 06/11] net/smc: ignore loopback-ism when dumping SMC-D devices Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 07/11] net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 08/11] net/smc: add operations to merge sndbuf with peer DMB Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 09/11] net/smc: attach or detach ghost sndbuf to " Wen Gu
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 10/11] net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged Wen Gu
2024-03-21 8:12 ` Jan Karcher
2024-03-22 1:49 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2024-03-17 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 11/11] net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-03-21 8:11 ` [RFC PATCH net-next v4 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Jan Karcher
2024-03-22 12:36 ` Wen Gu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72c046f3-1eb5-44f8-b32b-1ff6471943a2@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox