public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] KVM: s390: Do storage key checking
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:52:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78e1c95f-26b3-eeb5-7e7e-7b9e79625eb2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211182215.2730017-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>

Am 11.02.22 um 19:22 schrieb Janis Schoetterl-Glausch:
> Check keys when emulating instructions and let user space do key checked
> accesses.
> User space can do so via an extension of the MEMOP IOCTL:
> * allow optional key checking
> * allow MEMOP on vm fd, so key checked accesses on absolute memory
>    become possible
> 
> I haven't finished the memop selftest rewrite, but decided to send out a
> new version anyway, since the functional patches are (hopefully) final
> and the memop selftest patch works. I'll reply to it with the
> rewritten version.
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220209170422.1910690-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220207165930.1608621-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> v3 -> v4
>   * rebase
>   * ignore key in memop if skey flag not specified
>   * fix nits in documentation
>   * pick up tags

I queued patches 1-9 for CI runners (and will also queue for next).

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-14 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-11 18:22 [PATCH v4 00/10] KVM: s390: Do storage key checking Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] s390/uaccess: Add copy_from/to_user_key functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 15:30   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] KVM: s390: Honor storage keys when accessing guest memory Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 15:52   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] KVM: s390: handle_tprot: Honor storage keys Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] KVM: s390: selftests: Test TEST PROTECTION emulation Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] KVM: s390: Add optional storage key checking to MEMOP IOCTL Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] KVM: s390: Add vm IOCTL for key checked guest absolute memory access Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 17:58   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-21 16:32   ` [PATCH] KVM: s390: Add missing vm MEM_OP size check Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-22  8:04     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] KVM: s390: Rename existing vcpu memop functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] KVM: s390: Add capability for storage key extension of MEM_OP IOCTL Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 14:29   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-02-14 17:47   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] KVM: s390: Update api documentation for memop ioctl Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 17:52   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] KVM: s390: selftests: Test memops with storage keys Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-02-14 14:52 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78e1c95f-26b3-eeb5-7e7e-7b9e79625eb2@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox