From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
thuth@redhat.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add pv guest requirement check function
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:26:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b6b05b8-5c07-69b5-dbd0-f1f5e48ecd9a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421161353.2dfaea97@p-imbrenda>
On 4/21/23 16:13, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:36:44 +0000
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> When running PV guests some of the UV memory needs to be allocated
>> with > 31 bit addresses which means tests with PV guests will always
>> need a lot more memory than other tests.
>> Additionally facilities nr 158 and sclp.sief2 need to be available.
>>
>> Let's add a function that checks for these requirements and prints a
>> helpful skip message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> lib/s390x/snippet.h | 7 +++++++
>> lib/s390x/uv.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/s390x/uv.h | 1 +
>> s390x/pv-diags.c | 8 +-------
>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/snippet.h b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> index 57045994..11ec54c3 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@
>> #define SNIPPET_HDR_LEN(type, file) \
>> ((uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_END(type, file) - (uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_START(type, file))
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Some of the UV memory needs to be allocated with >31 bit
>> + * addresses which means we need a lot more memory than other
>> + * tests.
>> + */
>> +#define SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE (SZ_1M * 2200UL)
>> +
>> #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK0 0x42UL
>> #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK1 0UL
>> #define SNIPPET_UNPACK_OFF 0
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/uv.c b/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> index 383271a5..db47536c 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include <asm/uv.h>
>> #include <uv.h>
>> #include <sie.h>
>> +#include <snippet.h>
>>
>> static struct uv_cb_qui uvcb_qui = {
>> .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_QUI,
>> @@ -38,6 +39,25 @@ bool uv_os_is_host(void)
>> return test_facility(158) && uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_INIT_UV);
>> }
>>
>> +bool uv_guest_requirement_checks(void)
>
> I would call it uv_host_requirement_checks since it will run on the
> host to check if the host meets certain requirements
Sure
If someone has a shorter suggestion I'd also be happy to hear it.
>
>> +{
>> + if (!test_facility(158)) {
>> + report_skip("UV Call facility unavailable");
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
>> + report_skip("SIEF2 facility unavailable");
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (get_ram_size() < SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE) {
>> + report_skip("Not enough memory. This test needs about %ld MB of memory",
>> + SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE / 1024 / 1024);
>
> a better way to do this would be to check the amount of memory needed
> by the Ultravisor and check if that size + 2GB is available
>
> of course in that case unittest.cfg would also need to be adjusted
Could do, but in this case I opted for simplicity.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-24 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 11:36 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/7] s390x: Add PV SIE intercepts and ipl tests Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/7] lib: s390x: uv: Introduce UV validity function Janosch Frank
2023-05-31 13:36 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add intercept data check library function Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-26 11:22 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/7] s390x: pv-diags: Drop snippet from snippet names Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-26 11:24 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add pv guest requirement check function Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:13 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-24 8:26 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-04-26 11:27 ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: pv: Add sie entry intercept and validity test Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 15:23 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/7] s390x: pv: Add IPL reset tests Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 15:32 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: pv-diags: Add the test to unittests.conf Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b6b05b8-5c07-69b5-dbd0-f1f5e48ecd9a@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox