public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	thuth@redhat.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add pv guest requirement check function
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:26:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b6b05b8-5c07-69b5-dbd0-f1f5e48ecd9a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421161353.2dfaea97@p-imbrenda>

On 4/21/23 16:13, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:36:44 +0000
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> When running PV guests some of the UV memory needs to be allocated
>> with > 31 bit addresses which means tests with PV guests will always
>> need a lot more memory than other tests.
>> Additionally facilities nr 158 and sclp.sief2 need to be available.
>>
>> Let's add a function that checks for these requirements and prints a
>> helpful skip message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/s390x/snippet.h |  7 +++++++
>>   lib/s390x/uv.c      | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   lib/s390x/uv.h      |  1 +
>>   s390x/pv-diags.c    |  8 +-------
>>   4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/snippet.h b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> index 57045994..11ec54c3 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,13 @@
>>   #define SNIPPET_HDR_LEN(type, file) \
>>   	((uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_END(type, file) - (uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_START(type, file))
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Some of the UV memory needs to be allocated with >31 bit
>> + * addresses which means we need a lot more memory than other
>> + * tests.
>> + */
>> +#define SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE	(SZ_1M * 2200UL)
>> +
>>   #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK0	0x42UL
>>   #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK1	0UL
>>   #define SNIPPET_UNPACK_OFF	0
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/uv.c b/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> index 383271a5..db47536c 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/uv.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>   #include <asm/uv.h>
>>   #include <uv.h>
>>   #include <sie.h>
>> +#include <snippet.h>
>>   
>>   static struct uv_cb_qui uvcb_qui = {
>>   	.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_QUI,
>> @@ -38,6 +39,25 @@ bool uv_os_is_host(void)
>>   	return test_facility(158) && uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_INIT_UV);
>>   }
>>   
>> +bool uv_guest_requirement_checks(void)
> 
> I would call it uv_host_requirement_checks since it will run on the
> host to check if the host meets certain requirements

Sure
If someone has a shorter suggestion I'd also be happy to hear it.

> 
>> +{
>> +	if (!test_facility(158)) {
>> +		report_skip("UV Call facility unavailable");
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +	if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
>> +		report_skip("SIEF2 facility unavailable");
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +	if (get_ram_size() < SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE) {
>> +		report_skip("Not enough memory. This test needs about %ld MB of memory",
>> +			    SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE / 1024 / 1024);
> 
> a better way to do this would be to check the amount of memory needed
> by the Ultravisor and check if that size + 2GB is available
> 
> of course in that case unittest.cfg would also need to be adjusted

Could do, but in this case I opted for simplicity.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-24  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-21 11:36 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/7] s390x: Add PV SIE intercepts and ipl tests Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/7] lib: s390x: uv: Introduce UV validity function Janosch Frank
2023-05-31 13:36   ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add intercept data check library function Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-26 11:22   ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/7] s390x: pv-diags: Drop snippet from snippet names Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-26 11:24   ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add pv guest requirement check function Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:13   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-24  8:26     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-04-26 11:27   ` Nico Boehr
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: pv: Add sie entry intercept and validity test Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 15:23   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/7] s390x: pv: Add IPL reset tests Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 15:32   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-04-21 11:36 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: pv-diags: Add the test to unittests.conf Janosch Frank
2023-04-21 14:10   ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b6b05b8-5c07-69b5-dbd0-f1f5e48ecd9a@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox