Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio

[Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>]

On 03.06.19 15:34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:57:30 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200
>> Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> @@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid,
>>>>>    	INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo);
>>>>>    	sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release;
>>>>>    	device_initialize(&sch->dev);
>>>>
>>>> It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here...
>>>
>>> @Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here...
>>>    
>>
>> How about?
>>
>> /*
>>   * The physical addresses of some the dma structures that
>>   * can belong  to a subchannel need to fit 31 bit width (examples ccw,).
>>   */
> 
> "e.g. ccw"?
> 
>>
>>
>>>>      
>>>>> +	sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
>>>>> +	sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>>>>>    	return sch;
>>>>>    
>>>>>    err:
>>>>> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
>>>>>    	dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
>>>>>    	css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
>>>>>    	css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
>>>>
>>>> ...and 64 bit here.
>>>
>>> and here.
>>
>> /*
>>   * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device
>>   * as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit
>>   * addresses.
>>   */
> 
> Thanks, that makes things hopefully clearer if we look at it some time
> in the future ;)
> 

Applied both with with requested change.

Michael