public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com
Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	farman@linux.ibm.com, clegoate@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma_region
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 23:04:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8380fe8052c9b972a8350394cb6655f6a9683d29.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207205335.473946-3-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 15:53 -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> PCI devices on s390 have a DMA offset that is reported via CLP.  In
> preparation for allowing identity domains, setup the bus_dma_region
> for all PCI devices using the reported CLP value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> index 857afbc4828f..b5c35b8e47a4 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/pci_clp.h>
>  #include <asm/pci_dma.h>
> @@ -283,10 +284,27 @@ static struct zpci_bus *zpci_bus_alloc(int topo, bool topo_is_tid)
>  	return zbus;
>  }
>  
> +static void pci_dma_range_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
> +	struct bus_dma_region *map;
> +
> +	map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!map)
> +		return;
> +
> +	map->cpu_start = 0;
> +	map->dma_start = PAGE_ALIGN(zdev->start_dma);
> +	map->size = max(PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(zdev->end_dma + 1) - map->dma_start, 0);

Ugh, this is my fault as I suggested it, but this max() doesn't work
here. The zdev->end_dma is unsigned and so is map->dma_start so if the
former is smaller underflow will occur and the max() won't save us.
It's largely a theoretical issue since zdev->end_dma + 1 should always
be larger than zdev->start_dma, but now the max() looks like we thought
of that, but then it doesn't work.

If we handle it maybe just go with:

aligned_end = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(zdev->end_dma + 1);
if (aligned_end >= map->dma_start)
     map->size = aligned_end - map->dma_start;
else
     map->size = 0;


> +	pdev->dev.dma_range_map = map;
> +}
> +
>  void pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci(pdev);
>  
> +	pci_dma_range_setup(pdev);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * With pdev->no_vf_scan the common PCI probing code does not
>  	 * perform PF/VF linking.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 20:53 [PATCH v4 0/4] iommu/s390: add support for IOMMU passthrough Matthew Rosato
2025-02-07 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] s390/pci: check for relaxed translation capability Matthew Rosato
2025-02-07 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] s390/pci: store DMA offset in bus_dma_region Matthew Rosato
2025-02-07 22:04   ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2025-02-12 15:23     ` Matthew Rosato
2025-02-12 16:15       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-02-07 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] iommu/s390: handle IOAT registration based on domain Matthew Rosato
2025-02-10 11:44   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-02-07 20:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] iommu/s390: implement iommu passthrough via identity domain Matthew Rosato
2025-02-10 11:47   ` Niklas Schnelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8380fe8052c9b972a8350394cb6655f6a9683d29.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clegoate@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox