public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG scsi_dh_alua sleeping from invalid context && kernel WARNING do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:03:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <983f47533ee56b2a954de97dc7e02cbcbc4f9841.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bea9c3e-2a61-a51e-c13b-796adabe6f71@acm.org>

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 13:52 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 1/17/23 13:48, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Yes, that was my suggestion. Just defer the scsi_device_put() call
> > in
> > alua_rtpg_queue() in the case where the actual RTPG handler is not
> > queued. I won't have time for that before next week though.
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Do you agree that the call trace shared by Steffen is not sufficient
> to 
> conclude that this change is necessary?

Hmm, I suppose I missed your point... to re-iterate my thinking:

 1 alua_queue_rtpg() must take a ref to the sdev before queueing work,
   whether or not the caller already has one
 2 queue_delayed_work() can fail
 3 if queue_delayed_work() fails, alua_queue_rtpg() must drop the ref
   it just took
 4 BUT (and this is what I guess I missed) this ref can't be the last
   one dropped, because the caller of alua_rtpg_queue() must still hold
   a reference. And scsi_device_put() only sleeps if the last ref is
   dropped. Therefore the issue in Steffen's call stack should
   indeed be fixed just by removing the might_sleep(). If all callers
   callers of alua_rtpg_queue() must hold an sdev reference (I believe 
   they do), we can indeed remove the might_sleep() entirely.

Is this correct reasoning, and what you meant previously? If yes, I
agree, and I apologize for not realizing it in the first place. 
But I think this is subtle enough to deserve a comment in the code.

Thanks
Martin


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-17 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16 14:59 kernel BUG scsi_dh_alua sleeping from invalid context && kernel WARNING do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING Steffen Maier
2023-01-16 16:57 ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-16 17:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-16 17:58     ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-17  9:28     ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-17 18:50       ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-17 21:48         ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-17 21:52           ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-17 22:03             ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2023-01-18  0:29               ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-18  8:45                 ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-18 16:17                 ` Steffen Maier
2023-01-24 11:16                   ` Steffen Maier
2023-01-24 11:36                     ` Martin Wilck
2023-01-16 17:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-16 18:12   ` Steffen Maier
2023-01-16 18:31     ` Bart Van Assche
2023-01-17  7:46   ` Martin Wilck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=983f47533ee56b2a954de97dc7e02cbcbc4f9841.camel@suse.com \
    --to=mwilck@suse.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox