Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net/smc: support smc release version negotiation in clc handshake

[Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>]

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the review.

Before this patch set, the ini pointer is NULL when sending accept clc msg. This patch set
has changed the ini pointer to non-NULL value both when sending accept clc msg and when
sending confirm clc msg. And the ini pointer in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept will not be NULL
any more.

I will remove the ini NULL check in the next version.
if (ini && clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM) => if (clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM)

Thanks,
Guangguan Wang

On 2023/8/4 01:42, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 09:24:17PM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> Hi Guangguan Wang,
> 
>> @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
>>  				memcpy(clc_v2->r1.eid, eid, SMC_MAX_EID_LEN);
>>  			len = SMCR_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN_V2;
>>  			if (first_contact) {
>> -				smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, &len);
>> +				smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, &len, ini->release_ver);
> 
> Here ini is dereferenced...
> 
> 
>>  				fce.v2_direct = !link->lgr->uses_gateway;
>>  				memset(&gle, 0, sizeof(gle));
>>  				if (ini && clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM) {
> 
> ... but here it is assumed that ini may be NULL.
> 
> This seems inconsistent.
> 
> As flagged by Smatch.
> 
> ...
>