From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:16:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a466109-01c5-96b0-bf03-304123f435ee@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230717-dma_iommu-v11-5-a7a0b83c355c@linux.ibm.com>
On 2023-07-17 12:00, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In some virtualized environments, including s390 paged memory guests,
> IOTLB flushes are used to update IOMMU shadow tables. Due to this, they
> are much more expensive than in typical bare metal environments or
> non-paged s390 guests. In addition they may parallelize poorly in
> virtualized environments. This changes the trade off for flushing IOVAs
> such that minimizing the number of IOTLB flushes trumps any benefit of
> cheaper queuing operations or increased paralellism.
>
> In this scenario per-CPU flush queues pose several problems. Firstly
> per-CPU memory is often quite limited prohibiting larger queues.
> Secondly collecting IOVAs per-CPU but flushing via a global timeout
> reduces the number of IOVAs flushed for each timeout especially on s390
> where PCI interrupts may not be bound to a specific CPU.
>
> Let's introduce a single flush queue mode that reuses the same queue
> logic but only allocates a single global queue. This mode is selected by
> dma-iommu if a newly introduced .shadow_on_flush flag is set in struct
> dev_iommu. As a first user the s390 IOMMU driver sets this flag during
> probe_device. With the unchanged small FQ size and timeouts this setting
> is worse than per-CPU queues but a follow up patch will make the FQ size
> and timeout variable. Together this allows the common IOVA flushing code
> to more closely resemble the global flush behavior used on s390's
> previous internal DMA API implementation.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/3e402947-61f9-b7e8-1414-fde006257b6f@arm.com/
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> #s390
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 +----
The hunks in iommu.c appear to be an inadvertent reversion of patch #1?
A few bonus nits below which you can take or leave, but otherwise, with
the rebase-mishap fixed:
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 3 +
> include/linux/iommu.h | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index e57724163835..4ada8b9749c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -43,14 +43,23 @@ enum iommu_dma_cookie_type {
> IOMMU_DMA_MSI_COOKIE,
> };
>
> +struct dma_iommu_options {
> +#define IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_PER_CPU_QUEUE 0L
Nit: if the intent is to add more flags then that will no longer make
sense, and if not then we may as well just have a bool ;)
> +#define IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE BIT(0)
> + u64 flags;
> +};
> +
> struct iommu_dma_cookie {
> enum iommu_dma_cookie_type type;
> union {
> /* Full allocator for IOMMU_DMA_IOVA_COOKIE */
> struct {
> struct iova_domain iovad;
> -
> - struct iova_fq __percpu *fq; /* Flush queue */
> + /* Flush queue */
> + union {
> + struct iova_fq *single_fq;
> + struct iova_fq __percpu *percpu_fq;
> + };
> /* Number of TLB flushes that have been started */
> atomic64_t fq_flush_start_cnt;
> /* Number of TLB flushes that have been finished */
> @@ -67,6 +76,8 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
>
> /* Domain for flush queue callback; NULL if flush queue not in use */
> struct iommu_domain *fq_domain;
> + /* Options for dma-iommu use */
> + struct dma_iommu_options options;
> struct mutex mutex;
> };
>
> @@ -124,7 +135,7 @@ static inline unsigned int fq_ring_add(struct iova_fq *fq)
> return idx;
> }
>
> -static void fq_ring_free(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie, struct iova_fq *fq)
> +static void fq_ring_free_locked(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie, struct iova_fq *fq)
> {
> u64 counter = atomic64_read(&cookie->fq_flush_finish_cnt);
> unsigned int idx;
> @@ -145,6 +156,15 @@ static void fq_ring_free(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie, struct iova_fq *fq)
> }
> }
>
> +static void fq_ring_free(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie, struct iova_fq *fq)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fq->lock, flags);
> + fq_ring_free_locked(cookie, fq);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fq->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> static void fq_flush_iotlb(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> {
> atomic64_inc(&cookie->fq_flush_start_cnt);
> @@ -152,23 +172,29 @@ static void fq_flush_iotlb(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> atomic64_inc(&cookie->fq_flush_finish_cnt);
> }
>
> +static void fq_flush_percpu(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct iova_fq *fq;
> +
> + fq = per_cpu_ptr(cookie->percpu_fq, cpu);
> + fq_ring_free(cookie, fq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void fq_flush_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = from_timer(cookie, t, fq_timer);
> - int cpu;
>
> atomic_set(&cookie->fq_timer_on, 0);
> fq_flush_iotlb(cookie);
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - unsigned long flags;
> - struct iova_fq *fq;
> -
> - fq = per_cpu_ptr(cookie->fq, cpu);
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&fq->lock, flags);
> - fq_ring_free(cookie, fq);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fq->lock, flags);
> - }
> + if (cookie->options.flags & IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE)
> + fq_ring_free(cookie, cookie->single_fq);
> + else
> + fq_flush_percpu(cookie);
Nit: honestly I'd just inline that as:
else for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
fq_ring_free(cookie, per_cpu_ptr(cookie->percpu_fq, cpu));
(possibly with extra braces if you don't feel brave enough to join the
elite "else for" club...)
> }
>
> static void queue_iova(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie,
> @@ -188,7 +214,11 @@ static void queue_iova(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie,
> */
> smp_mb();
>
> - fq = raw_cpu_ptr(cookie->fq);
> + if (cookie->options.flags & IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE)
> + fq = cookie->single_fq;
> + else
> + fq = raw_cpu_ptr(cookie->percpu_fq);
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fq->lock, flags);
>
> /*
> @@ -196,11 +226,11 @@ static void queue_iova(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie,
> * flushed out on another CPU. This makes the fq_full() check below less
> * likely to be true.
> */
> - fq_ring_free(cookie, fq);
> + fq_ring_free_locked(cookie, fq);
>
> if (fq_full(fq)) {
> fq_flush_iotlb(cookie);
> - fq_ring_free(cookie, fq);
> + fq_ring_free_locked(cookie, fq);
> }
>
> idx = fq_ring_add(fq);
> @@ -219,31 +249,90 @@ static void queue_iova(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie,
> jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(IOVA_FQ_TIMEOUT));
> }
>
> -static void iommu_dma_free_fq(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> +static void iommu_dma_free_fq_single(struct iova_fq *fq)
> +{
> + int idx;
> +
> + if (!fq)
> + return;
Nit: That should never be true if cookie->fq_domain was set
> + fq_ring_for_each(idx, fq)
> + put_pages_list(&fq->entries[idx].freelist);
> + vfree(fq);
> +}
> +
> +static void iommu_dma_free_fq_percpu(struct iova_fq __percpu *percpu_fq)
> {
> int cpu, idx;
>
> - if (!cookie->fq)
> - return;
> -
> - del_timer_sync(&cookie->fq_timer);
> /* The IOVAs will be torn down separately, so just free our queued pages */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct iova_fq *fq = per_cpu_ptr(cookie->fq, cpu);
> + struct iova_fq *fq = per_cpu_ptr(percpu_fq, cpu);
>
> fq_ring_for_each(idx, fq)
> put_pages_list(&fq->entries[idx].freelist);
> }
>
> - free_percpu(cookie->fq);
> + free_percpu(percpu_fq);
> +}
> +
> +static void iommu_dma_free_fq(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> +{
> + if (!cookie->fq_domain)
> + return;
> +
> + del_timer_sync(&cookie->fq_timer);
> + if (cookie->options.flags & IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE)
> + iommu_dma_free_fq_single(cookie->single_fq);
> + else
> + iommu_dma_free_fq_percpu(cookie->percpu_fq);
> +}
> +
> +static void iommu_dma_init_one_fq(struct iova_fq *fq)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + fq->head = 0;
> + fq->tail = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&fq->lock);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < IOVA_FQ_SIZE; i++)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fq->entries[i].freelist);
> +}
> +
> +static int iommu_dma_init_fq_single(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> +{
> + struct iova_fq *queue;
> +
> + queue = vzalloc(sizeof(*queue));
Nit: vmalloc() - no need to zero the whole thing when the percpu path
doesn't.
> + if (!queue)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + iommu_dma_init_one_fq(queue);
> + cookie->single_fq = queue;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int iommu_dma_init_fq_percpu(struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie)
> +{
> + struct iova_fq __percpu *queue;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + queue = alloc_percpu(struct iova_fq);
> + if (!queue)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + iommu_dma_init_one_fq(per_cpu_ptr(queue, cpu));
> + cookie->percpu_fq = queue;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* sysfs updates are serialised by the mutex of the group owning @domain */
> int iommu_dma_init_fq(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> {
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
> - struct iova_fq __percpu *queue;
> - int i, cpu;
> + int rc;
>
> if (cookie->fq_domain)
> return 0;
> @@ -251,26 +340,16 @@ int iommu_dma_init_fq(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> atomic64_set(&cookie->fq_flush_start_cnt, 0);
> atomic64_set(&cookie->fq_flush_finish_cnt, 0);
>
> - queue = alloc_percpu(struct iova_fq);
> - if (!queue) {
> + if (cookie->options.flags & IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE)
> + rc = iommu_dma_init_fq_single(cookie);
> + else
> + rc = iommu_dma_init_fq_percpu(cookie);
> +
> + if (rc) {
> pr_warn("iova flush queue initialization failed\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct iova_fq *fq = per_cpu_ptr(queue, cpu);
> -
> - fq->head = 0;
> - fq->tail = 0;
> -
> - spin_lock_init(&fq->lock);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < IOVA_FQ_SIZE; i++)
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fq->entries[i].freelist);
> - }
> -
> - cookie->fq = queue;
> -
> timer_setup(&cookie->fq_timer, fq_flush_timeout, 0);
> atomic_set(&cookie->fq_timer_on, 0);
> /*
> @@ -297,6 +376,7 @@ static struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie_alloc(enum iommu_dma_cookie_type type)
> if (cookie) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cookie->msi_page_list);
> cookie->type = type;
> + cookie->options.flags = IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_PER_CPU_QUEUE;
You see, this confused me into thinking it does something and I had to
go back and check ;)
> }
> return cookie;
> }
> @@ -614,10 +694,18 @@ static int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base,
> if (ret)
> goto done_unlock;
>
> - /* If the FQ fails we can simply fall back to strict mode */
> - if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ &&
> - (!device_iommu_capable(dev, IOMMU_CAP_DEFERRED_FLUSH) || iommu_dma_init_fq(domain)))
> - domain->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
> + if (domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ) {
> + /* Expensive shadowing IOTLB flushes require some tuning */
> + if (dev->iommu->shadow_on_flush)
> + cookie->options.flags |= IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE;
It would probably be better to set this regardless of the domain type,
in case the FQ is only brought up later via sysfs.
> +
> + /* If the FQ fails we can simply fall back to strict mode */
> + if (!device_iommu_capable(dev, IOMMU_CAP_DEFERRED_FLUSH) ||
> + iommu_dma_init_fq(domain)) {
> + domain->type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
> + cookie->options.flags &= ~IOMMU_DMA_OPTS_SINGLE_QUEUE;
...and either way there should be no need to clear it again - if it was
true once it will always be true.
Cheers,
Robin.
> + }
> + }
>
> ret = iova_reserve_iommu_regions(dev, domain);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index fd9f79731d6a..caaf563d38ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -2413,17 +2413,8 @@ int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ret = __iommu_map(domain, iova, paddr, size, prot, gfp);
> - if (ret == 0 && ops->iotlb_sync_map) {
> - ret = ops->iotlb_sync_map(domain, iova, size);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> -
> - return ret;
> -
> -out_err:
> - /* undo mappings already done */
> - iommu_unmap(domain, iova, size);
> + if (ret == 0 && ops->iotlb_sync_map)
> + ops->iotlb_sync_map(domain, iova, size);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2564,11 +2555,8 @@ ssize_t iommu_map_sg(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> sg = sg_next(sg);
> }
>
> - if (ops->iotlb_sync_map) {
> - ret = ops->iotlb_sync_map(domain, iova, mapped);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_err;
> - }
> + if (ops->iotlb_sync_map)
> + ops->iotlb_sync_map(domain, iova, mapped);
> return mapped;
>
> out_err:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
> index 020cc538e4c4..63c56a440c9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
> @@ -468,6 +468,9 @@ static struct iommu_device *s390_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> if (zdev->end_dma > ZPCI_TABLE_SIZE_RT - 1)
> zdev->end_dma = ZPCI_TABLE_SIZE_RT - 1;
>
> + if (zdev->tlb_refresh)
> + dev->iommu->shadow_on_flush = 1;
> +
> return &zdev->iommu_dev;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 182cc4c71e62..c3687e066ed7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ struct iommu_fault_param {
> * @priv: IOMMU Driver private data
> * @max_pasids: number of PASIDs this device can consume
> * @attach_deferred: the dma domain attachment is deferred
> + * @shadow_on_flush: IOTLB flushes are used to sync shadow tables
> *
> * TODO: migrate other per device data pointers under iommu_dev_data, e.g.
> * struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> @@ -422,6 +423,7 @@ struct dev_iommu {
> void *priv;
> u32 max_pasids;
> u32 attach_deferred:1;
> + u32 shadow_on_flush:1;
> };
>
> int iommu_device_register(struct iommu_device *iommu,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 11:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/dma: s390 DMA API conversion and optimized IOTLB flushing Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] iommu: Allow .iotlb_sync_map to fail and handle s390's -ENOMEM return Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] s390/pci: prepare is_passed_through() for dma-iommu Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] iommu/s390: Force ISM devices to use IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-19 12:56 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-08-18 19:10 ` Robin Murphy
2023-08-23 10:53 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs Niklas Schnelle
2023-08-18 18:16 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-08-23 14:21 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-08-29 15:39 ` Robin Murphy
2023-07-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/dma: Use a large flush queue and timeout for shadow_on_flush Niklas Schnelle
2023-08-18 19:06 ` Robin Murphy
2023-08-18 16:51 ` [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/dma: s390 DMA API conversion and optimized IOTLB flushing Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a466109-01c5-96b0-bf03-304123f435ee@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox