From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] selftests: KVM: Add fpu and one reg set/get library functions
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:10:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d9e0e7a-b006-98b1-6bf0-8c46006835bc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200130135512.diyyu3wvwqlwpqlx@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5100 bytes --]
On 1/30/20 2:55 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:36:21AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 29/01/2020 21.03, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> Add library access to more registers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 6 +++
>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>>> index 29cccaf96baf..ae0d14c2540a 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>>> @@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ void vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>>> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
>>> int _vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>>> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
>>> +void vcpu_fpu_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>>> + struct kvm_fpu *fpu);
>>> +void vcpu_fpu_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>>> + struct kvm_fpu *fpu);
>>> +void vcpu_get_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
>>> +void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
>>> #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
>>> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
>>> index 41cf45416060..dae117728ec6 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
>>> @@ -1373,6 +1373,54 @@ int _vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>>> return ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, sregs);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void vcpu_fpu_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_find(vm, vcpuid);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu != NULL, "vcpu not found, vcpuid: %u", vcpuid);
>>> +
>>> + ret = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_FPU, fpu);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_GET_FPU failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
>>> + ret, errno);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void vcpu_fpu_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_find(vm, vcpuid);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu != NULL, "vcpu not found, vcpuid: %u", vcpuid);
>>> +
>>> + ret = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_FPU, fpu);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_SET_FPU failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
>>> + ret, errno);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void vcpu_get_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_find(vm, vcpuid);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu != NULL, "vcpu not found, vcpuid: %u", vcpuid);
>>> +
>>> + ret = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, reg);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_GET_ONE_REG failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
>>> + ret, errno);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_find(vm, vcpuid);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu != NULL, "vcpu not found, vcpuid: %u", vcpuid);
>>> +
>>> + ret = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, reg);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_SET_ONE_REG failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
>>> + ret, errno);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * VCPU Ioctl
>>> *
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>
>
> How about what's below instead. It should be equivalent.
With your proposed changes we loose a bit verbosity in the error
messages. I need to think about which I like more.
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> index 29cccaf96baf..d96a072e69bf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,31 @@ void vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> int _vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> +
> +static inline void
> +vcpu_fpu_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
> +{
> + vcpu_ioctl(vm, vcpuid, KVM_GET_FPU, fpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +vcpu_fpu_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
> +{
> + vcpu_ioctl(vm, vcpuid, KVM_SET_FPU, fpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +vcpu_get_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> +{
> + vcpu_ioctl(vm, vcpuid, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +vcpu_set_reg(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> +{
> + vcpu_ioctl(vm, vcpuid, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, reg);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 20:03 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: s390: Add new reset vcpu API Janosch Frank
2020-01-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] " Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 8:55 ` [PATCH/FIXUP FOR STABLE BEFORE THIS SERIES] KVM: s390: do not clobber user space fpc during guest reset Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 9:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-30 10:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-30 10:56 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-30 11:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 11:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 11:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 11:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-30 11:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 11:42 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: do not clobber user space registers during guest reset/store status Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 12:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-30 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-30 9:00 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: s390: Add new reset vcpu API Thomas Huth
2020-01-30 9:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-01-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] selftests: KVM: Add fpu and one reg set/get library functions Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 10:36 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-30 13:55 ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 14:10 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-01-30 14:30 ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 14:58 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 15:04 ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] selftests: KVM: s390x: Add reset tests Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 10:51 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-30 11:32 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 11:36 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-29 20:03 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] selftests: KVM: testing the local IRQs resets Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 10:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-30 11:18 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 11:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-01-30 11:34 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 11:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-30 11:33 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-30 9:10 ` [PATCH] KVM: s390: Cleanup initial cpu reset Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d9e0e7a-b006-98b1-6bf0-8c46006835bc@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox