From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/io: Fix ioremap and iounmap undefinded issue for s390
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4780da8c899f2272923cc4fe72814891845226.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAfSe-v0DbOS5p7nF0db4SdTrsy28gJNdW93ds4capVxuUO1xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 17:40 +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 16:24, Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 16:03 +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> > >
> > > There would not be ioremap and iounmap implementations if CONFIG_PCI is
> > > not set for s390, so add default declarations of these two functions
> > > for the case to avoid 'undefined reference' issue.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 71ba41c9b1d9 ("s390/pci: provide support for MIO instructions")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>
> > > ---
> > > The issue was reported from https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/1/18
> >
> > Thanks for the patch but I'm a little skeptical about adding
> > ioremap()/iounmap() stubs that don't do anything useful and on top ofn
> > that would do so silently.
> >
> > In the above discussion you said that TIMER_OF should depend on
> > HAS_IOMEM. In arch/s390/Kconfig HAS_IOMEM is set if and only if
> > CONFIG_PCI is set so that sounds to me like it would prevent the
> > undefined reference without the risk of someone trying to use io*map()
> > without CONFIG_PCI.
>
> Humm... you can ignore my reply on that time, I later found that's not
> correct :)
>
> TIMER_OF would be selected by other configs and it seems not able to
> depends on HAS_IOMEM, unless all configs which select TIMER_OF depend
> on HAS_IOMEM, that would be a big change.
Hmm I already see a lot of the options in drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
depend on HAS_IOMEM and drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c definitely calls
iounmap() so wouldn't that be the logical change even if it is bigger?
>
> Actually HAS_IOMEM is set as default on other architectures, but not
> for s390 which redefined it.
Yes because most architectures always have IOMEM and io*map() functions
I believe. s390 is an exception here as the mainframe native
functionality all works without MMIO and you can run a fully functional
system including networking and block devices without any MMIO, PCI and
without ioremap()/iounmap().
>
> > At the very least I think the functions should do a WARN_ONCE() but
> > then we have the same situation as discussed below with Linus making it
> > pretty clear that he prefers these cases to be compile time checked:
>
> Ok, if I understand correctly, if io*map is not implemented for some
> case, there should be a *compile-time* error rather than adding a stub
> function to make this kind of errors disappeared.
>
> Please correct me if I missed something.
Ideally not a compile time error but a compile time flag such as a
Kconfig option that would make sure that if HAS_IOMEM isn't set we
don't get drivers compiled which depend on working io*map(). After all
these drivers will surely not be functional.
>
> Thanks,
> Chunyan
>
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/2/511
> >
> >
> > > ---
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/io.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/io.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/io.h
> > > index e3882b012bfa..9438370c6445 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/io.h
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/io.h
> > > @@ -23,11 +23,8 @@ void unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(phys_addr_t phys, void *addr);
> > > #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0
> > >
> > >
> > .. snip ..
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-03 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-03 7:56 [PATCH] s390/io: Fix ioremap and iounmap undefinded issue for s390 Chunyan Zhang
2021-09-03 8:03 ` Chunyan Zhang
2021-09-03 8:24 ` Niklas Schnelle
2021-09-03 9:40 ` Chunyan Zhang
2021-09-03 10:28 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2021-09-03 10:51 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4780da8c899f2272923cc4fe72814891845226.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox