From: "Nico Boehr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>,
<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/5] s390x: sclp: Remove unnecessary padding from struct sclp_facilities
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:10:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHTOKQ1LRG2N.367JA1MZ9W2DI@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324-vsie-stfle-fac-v2-2-5e52be2e4081@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue Mar 24, 2026 at 4:28 PM CET, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Struct sclp_facilities is only used within the guest to keep the facility
> information. Nothing bad should happen when the struct size changes in the
> future.
>
> Suggested-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/sclp.h | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> index 22f120d1b7ea7d1c3fe822385d0c689e5b3459fe..42a2f2e9f25a45d3ebd71729df0d9d6d93a4fb50 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> @@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ struct sclp_facilities {
> uint64_t has_kss : 1;
> uint64_t has_pfmfi : 1;
> uint64_t has_ibs : 1;
> - uint64_t : 64 - 15;
> };
If I'm not mistaken this is already wrong if I did proper counting since
there are 17 bits and we only subtract 15.
Since bit fields are guaranteed to be allocated left to right (see [1], p 14),
this change makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
[1] ELF Application Binary Interface s390x Supplement, Version 1.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 15:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/5] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
2026-03-24 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/5] s390x: snippets: Add reset_guest() to lib Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-15 11:00 ` Nico Boehr
2026-03-24 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/5] s390x: sclp: Remove unnecessary padding from struct sclp_facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-03-25 9:20 ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 11:10 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2026-03-24 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/5] s390x: sclp: Rework sclp_facilities_setup() for simpler control flow Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-15 11:27 ` Nico Boehr
2026-03-24 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/5] s390x: sclp: Add detection of alternate STFLE facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-15 11:34 ` Nico Boehr
2026-03-24 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/5] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
2026-03-25 10:18 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHTOKQ1LRG2N.367JA1MZ9W2DI@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox