From: "Tobias Schumacher" <ts@linux.ibm.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>,
"Tobias Schumacher" <ts@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] s390/pci: Fix use-after-free race in zpci floating interrupt cleanup
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:22:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM05UI42G3Y8.M70PK5HKUNKQ@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-164948@kernel.org>
On Fri Oct 9, 2026 at 8:32 AM CEST, sashiko-bot wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] s390/pci: pending directed MSIs cause spurious interrupts on reallocation
> --
>
> commit 125383b5f8790de7f1cbeff916db7b71f9226ee6
> Author: Tobias Schumacher <ts@linux.ibm.com>
>
> s390/pci: Fix use-after-free race in zpci floating interrupt cleanup
>
> This commit splits directed vectors from floating vectors into a separate
> zpci_dibv array and adds RCU synchronization to zpci_msi_teardown_floating()
> to prevent use-after-free issues. It also annotates zpci_ibv with __rcu to
> ensure safe access to floating vectors during teardown.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> index d5763c5feb097..c5fabad381395 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -342,13 +343,16 @@ static struct airq_struct zpci_airq = {
>>
>> static void zpci_msi_teardown_directed(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>> {
>> - airq_iv_free(zpci_ibv[0], zdev->msi_first_bit, zdev->msi_nr_irqs);
>> + airq_iv_free(zpci_dibv[0], zdev->msi_first_bit, zdev->msi_nr_irqs);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this code leave pending DMA bits on remote CPUs intact?
>
> Only CPU 0's vector is passed to airq_iv_free() here, which clears the
> physical vector bits on CPU 0 but leaves them untouched on remote CPUs.
>
> If a hardware adapter interrupt was pending on a remote CPU in
> zpci_dibv[N]->vector, the bit remains set. Furthermore, there is no
> synchronization (such as synchronize_rcu() or draining) to ensure remote
> CPUs have finished processing the old bit before it is freed.
>
> When a new device allocates the same MSI bit, it will overwrite the ptr and
> data fields across all CPUs without memory barriers. If a remote CPU then
> processes its delayed interrupt, it will read the newly populated ptr and
> data, resulting in a spurious interrupt delivered to the wrong device or a
> potential kernel panic from an inconsistent domain/hwirq pair.
The only change this patch makes to zpci_msi_teardown_directed() is the
rename from zpci_ibv to zpci_dibv. Freeing the directed bits only in
CPU 0's vector goes back to the original commit introducing directed
interrupts. A stale bit on a remote CPU could in theory end up as a
spurious interrupt for a device that later gets the same bit, but until
the bit is reused, the cleared pointer makes the lookup fail harmlessly.
I'll have a look at clearing the bits on all CPUs separately from this
series.
Thanks
Tobias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 6:15 [PATCH v3 0/8] s390/pci: Fix bugs in IRQ domain migration and resource cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] s390/pci: Fix double-free and NULL deref in zpci MSI domain cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/pci: Fix resource leak in zpci MSI setup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] s390/pci: Fix MSI directed-mode teardown IRQ bit count Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] s390/pci: Fix use-after-free race in zpci floating interrupt cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 8:22 ` Tobias Schumacher [this message]
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] s390/pci: Add error cleanup in zpci_directed_irq_init() Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] s390/pci: Set MSI_FLAG_NO_AFFINITY at IRQ init time Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] s390/pci: Drop the unused index argument of zpci_msi_clear_airq() Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] s390/pci: Unregister the adapter interrupt first in zpci_irq_exit() Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-09 6:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 7:10 ` Tobias Schumacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM05UI42G3Y8.M70PK5HKUNKQ@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ts@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox