public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390_domain aperture shrinking
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:53:36 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1bDEOar1GacgfkU@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017124558.1386337-4-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 02:45:55PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> The s390 IOMMU driver currently sets the IOMMU domain's aperture to
> match the device specific DMA address range of the device that is first
> attached. This is not ideal. For one if the domain has no device
> attached in the meantime the aperture could be shrunk allowing
> translations outside the aperture to exist in the translation tables.
> Also this is a bit of a misuse of the aperture which really should
> describe what addresses can be translated and not some device specific
> limitations.
> 
> Instead of misusing the aperture like this we can instead create
> reserved ranges for the ranges inaccessible to the attached devices
> allowing devices with overlapping ranges to still share an IOMMU domain.
> This also significantly simplifies s390_iommu_attach_device() allowing
> us to move the aperture check to the beginning of the function and
> removing the need to hold the device list's lock to check the aperture.
> 
> As we then use the same aperture for all domains and it only depends on
> the table properties we can already check zdev->start_dma/end_dma at
> probe time and turn the check on attach into a WARN_ON().
> 
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v5->v6:
> - Return -EINVAL after WARN_ON() in attach
> v4->v5:
> - Make aperture check in attach a WARN_ON() and fail in probe if
>   zdev->start_dma/end_dma doesn't git in aperture  (Jason)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-17 12:45 [PATCH v7 0/6] iommu/s390: Fixes related to attach and aperture handling Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] iommu/s390: Get rid of s390_domain_device Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] iommu/s390: Fix potential s390_domain aperture shrinking Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 15:02   ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] iommu/s390: Fix incorrect aperture check Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:54   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/s390: Fix incorrect pgsize_bitmap Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-17 12:45 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] iommu/s390: Implement map_pages()/unmap_pages() instead of map()/unmap() Niklas Schnelle
2022-10-24 16:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1bDEOar1GacgfkU@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox