From: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, kuba@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/smc: fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link()
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:28:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvtVKT44JuqhyWB2@TonyMac-Alibaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4c5b1ba19c926e8b3d1def2ff685f29b2631b24.1660152975.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:47:40AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> After we optimize the parallel capability of SMC-R connection
> establishment, there is a certain chance to trigger the
> following panic:
>
> PID: 5900 TASK: ffff88c1c8af4100 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "kworker/1:48"
> #0 [ffff9456c1cc79a0] machine_kexec at ffffffff870665b7
> #1 [ffff9456c1cc79f0] __crash_kexec at ffffffff871b4c7a
> #2 [ffff9456c1cc7ab0] crash_kexec at ffffffff871b5b60
> #3 [ffff9456c1cc7ac0] oops_end at ffffffff87026ce7
> #4 [ffff9456c1cc7ae0] page_fault_oops at ffffffff87075715
> #5 [ffff9456c1cc7b58] exc_page_fault at ffffffff87ad0654
> #6 [ffff9456c1cc7b80] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff87c00b62
> [exception RIP: ib_alloc_mr+19]
> RIP: ffffffffc0c9cce3 RSP: ffff9456c1cc7c38 RFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000004
> RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: ffff88c1ea281d00 R8: 000000020a34ffff R9: ffff88c1350bbb20
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000010 R14: ffff88c1ab040a50 R15: ffff88c1ea281d00
> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> #7 [ffff9456c1cc7c60] smc_ib_get_memory_region at ffffffffc0aff6df [smc]
> #8 [ffff9456c1cc7c88] smcr_buf_map_link at ffffffffc0b0278c [smc]
> #9 [ffff9456c1cc7ce0] __smc_buf_create at ffffffffc0b03586 [smc]
>
> The reason here is that when the server tries to create a second link,
> smc_llc_srv_add_link() has no protection and may add a new link to
> link group. This breaks the security environment protected by
> llc_conf_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
I am curious if this patch can be merged with the previous one? It seems
that this panic is introduced by previous one?
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 39dbf39..0b0c53a 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -1834,8 +1834,10 @@ static int smcr_serv_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc)
> smc_llc_link_active(link);
> smcr_lgr_set_type(link->lgr, SMC_LGR_SINGLE);
>
> + down_write(&link->lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> /* initial contact - try to establish second link */
> smc_llc_srv_add_link(link, NULL);
> + up_write(&link->lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 17:47 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11 11:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-16 9:43 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:47 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-16 12:52 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net/smc: fix SMC_CLC_DECL_ERR_REGRMB without smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2022-08-16 7:58 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net/smc: allow confirm/delete rkey response deliver multiplex D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:17 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net/smc: make SMC_LLC_FLOW_RKEY run concurrently D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net/smc: llc_conf_mutex refactor, replace it with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/smc: use read semaphores to reduce unnecessary blocking in smc_buf_create() & smcr_buf_unuse() D. Wythe
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/smc: reduce unnecessary blocking in smcr_lgr_reg_rmbs() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:24 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net/smc: replace mutex rmbs_lock and sndbufs_lock with rw_semaphore D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:37 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/smc: fix potential panic dues to unprotected smc_llc_srv_add_link() D. Wythe
2022-08-16 8:28 ` Tony Lu [this message]
2022-08-10 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net/smc: fix application data exception D. Wythe
2022-08-11 3:28 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net/smc: optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-11 5:13 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-11 12:31 ` Karsten Graul
2022-08-16 9:35 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-16 12:40 ` Tony Lu
2022-08-17 4:55 ` D. Wythe
2022-08-17 16:52 ` Jan Karcher
2022-08-18 13:06 ` D. Wythe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvtVKT44JuqhyWB2@TonyMac-Alibaba \
--to=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox