public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
	nrb@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/7] lib: s390x: Add ap library
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:42:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a289a445-7665-4013-adfe-dd95ac3558c0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1bb6df4-dea3-414d-9f53-dfd76571fbb7@linux.ibm.com>

On 2/5/24 19:15, Anthony Krowiak wrote:
> I made a few comments and suggestions. I am not very well-versed in the
> inline assembly code, so I'll leave that up to someone who is more
> knowledgeable. I copied @Harald since I believe it was him who wrote it.
> 
> On 2/2/24 9:59 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Add functions and definitions needed to test the Adjunct
>> Processor (AP) crypto interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

[...]

>> +/* Will later be extended to a proper setup function */
>> +bool ap_setup(void)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Base AP support has no STFLE or SCLP feature bit but the
>> +	 * PQAP QCI support is indicated via stfle bit 12. As this
>> +	 * library relies on QCI we bail out if it's not available.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!test_facility(12))
>> +		return false;
> 
> 
> The STFLE.12 can be turned off when starting the guest, so this may not
> be a valid test.
> 
> We use the ap_instructions_available function (in ap.h) which executes
> the TAPQ command to verify whether the AP instructions are installed or
> not. Maybe you can do something similar here:

This library relies on QCI, hence we only check for stfle.
I see no sense in manually probing the whole APQN space.


If stfle 12 is indicated I'd expect AP instructions to not generate 
exceptions or do they in a sane CPU model?


>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/ap.h b/lib/s390x/ap.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..b806513f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/ap.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * AP definitions
>> + *
>> + * Some parts taken from the Linux AP driver.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024
>> + * Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *	   Tony Krowiak <akrowia@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *	   Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> + *	   Harald Freudenberger <freude@de.ibm.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _S390X_AP_H_
>> +#define _S390X_AP_H_
>> +
>> +enum PQAP_FC {
>> +	PQAP_TEST_APQ,
>> +	PQAP_RESET_APQ,
>> +	PQAP_ZEROIZE_APQ,
>> +	PQAP_QUEUE_INT_CONTRL,
>> +	PQAP_QUERY_AP_CONF_INFO,
>> +	PQAP_QUERY_AP_COMP_TYPE,
>> +	PQAP_BEST_AP,
> 
> 
> Maybe use abbreviations like your function names above?
> 
> 	PQAP_TAPQ,
> 	PQAP_RAPQ,
> 	PQAP_ZAPQ,
> 	PQAP_AQIC,
> 	PQAP_QCI,
> 	PQAP_QACT,
> 	PQAP_QBAP
> 

Hmmmmmmm(TM)
My guess is that I tried making these constants readable without 
consulting architecture documents. But another option is using the 
constants that you suggested and adding comments with a long version.

Will do

[...]

>> +struct pqap_r0 {
>> +	uint32_t pad0;
>> +	uint8_t fc;
>> +	uint8_t t : 1;		/* Test facilities (TAPQ)*/
>> +	uint8_t pad1 : 7;
>> +	uint8_t ap;
> 
> 
> This is the APID part of an APQN, so how about renaming to 'apid'
> 
> 
>> +	uint8_t qn;
> 
> 
> This is the APQI  part of an APQN, so how about renaming to 'apqi'

Hmm Linux uses qid
I'll change it to the Linux naming convention, might take me a while though

> 
> 
>> +} __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> +
>> +struct pqap_r2 {
>> +	uint8_t s : 1;		/* Special Command facility */
>> +	uint8_t m : 1;		/* AP4KM */
>> +	uint8_t c : 1;		/* AP4KC */
>> +	uint8_t cop : 1;	/* AP is in coprocessor mode */
>> +	uint8_t acc : 1;	/* AP is in accelerator mode */
>> +	uint8_t xcp : 1;	/* AP is in XCP-mode */
>> +	uint8_t n : 1;		/* AP extended addressing facility */
>> +	uint8_t pad_0 : 1;
>> +	uint8_t pad_1[3];
> 
> 
> Is there a reason why the 'Classification'  field is left out?
> 

It's not used in this library and therefore I chose to not name it to 
make structs a bit more readable.

> 
>> +	uint8_t at;
>> +	uint8_t nd;
>> +	uint8_t pad_6;
>> +	uint8_t pad_7 : 4;
>> +	uint8_t qd : 4;
>> +} __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct pqap_r2) == sizeof(uint64_t), "pqap_r2 size");
>> +
>> +bool ap_setup(void);
>> +int ap_pqap_tapq(uint8_t ap, uint8_t qn, struct ap_queue_status *apqsw,
>> +		 struct pqap_r2 *r2);
>> +int ap_pqap_qci(struct ap_config_info *info);
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
>> index 7fce9f9d..4f6c627d 100644
>> --- a/s390x/Makefile
>> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ cflatobjs += lib/s390x/malloc_io.o
>>    cflatobjs += lib/s390x/uv.o
>>    cflatobjs += lib/s390x/sie.o
>>    cflatobjs += lib/s390x/fault.o
>> +cflatobjs += lib/s390x/ap.o
>>    
>>    OBJDIRS += lib/s390x
>>    


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02 14:59 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/7] s390x: Add base AP support Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/7] lib: s390x: Add ap library Janosch Frank
2024-02-05 18:15   ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-06  8:48     ` Harald Freudenberger
2024-02-06 15:45       ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-06 13:42     ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2024-02-06 15:55       ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-07  8:06         ` Harald Freudenberger
2024-02-07 14:30           ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/7] s390x: Add guest 2 AP test Janosch Frank
2024-02-20 16:38   ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-02-21  7:57     ` Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/7] lib: s390x: ap: Add proper ap setup code Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/7] s390x: ap: Add pqap aqic tests Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/7] s390x: ap: Add reset tests Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 6/7] lib: s390x: ap: Add tapq test facility bit Janosch Frank
2024-02-02 14:59 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 7/7] s390x: ap: Add nq/dq len test Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a289a445-7665-4013-adfe-dd95ac3558c0@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox