Re: [GIT PULL 0/6] KVM: s390: Fixes and features for 4.16

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 16/01/2018 16:03, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Paolo, Radim,
> 
> the first chunk (of already reviewed) patches for 4.16 via kvm/next.
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit ccff53fd86ee54022e3d841f3db9280b1deb22e4:
> 
>   KVM: x86: avoid unnecessary XSETBV on guest entry (2017-12-18 13:10:25 +0100)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git  tags/kvm-s390-next-4.16-1
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 715e0427049606f499ea6b485c997f93f0778c77:
> 
>   KVM: s390: cleanup struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt (2018-01-16 15:53:09 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> KVM: s390: Fixes and features for 4.16
> 
> - add the virtio-ccw transport for kvmconfig
> - more debug tracing for cpu model
> - cleanups and fixes
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Christian Borntraeger (3):
>       KVM: s390: use created_vcpus in more places
>       KVM: s390: add debug tracing for cpu features of CPU model
>       kvm_config: add CONFIG_S390_GUEST
> 
> David Hildenbrand (2):
>       s390x/mm: cleanup gmap_pte_op_walk()
>       KVM: s390: cleanup struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt
> 
> Michael Mueller (1):
>       KVM: s390: drop use of spin lock in __floating_irq_kick
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c        | 27 +++++++++++----------------
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h         |  2 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c             | 12 ++++--------
>  arch/s390/mm/gmap.c              | 23 ++++++++---------------
>  kernel/configs/kvm_guest.config  |  1 +
>  7 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 

We probably will have to rebase kvm/next, sorry, to remove a series that
had problems and (worse) complaints from the arch/x86 maintainers. :(
Can you rebase on top of 5cb0944c0c66004c0d9006a7f0fba5782ae38f69?

Thanks,

Paolo