From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:14:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a361e674-fa78-8c06-0583-29f8989d5493@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209170804.75d1fc9d@ibm-vm>
On 2/9/21 5:08 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:15:54 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> KVM and QEMU handle a SIGP stop and store status in two steps:
>> 1) Stop the CPU by injecting a stop request
>> 2) Store when the CPU has left SIE because of the stop request
>>
>> The problem is that the SIGP order is already considered completed by
>> KVM/QEMU when step 1 has been performed and not once both have
>> completed. In addition we currently don't implement the busy CC so a
>> kernel has no way of knowing that the store has finished other than
>> checking the location for the store.
>>
>> This workaround is based on the fact that for a new SIE entry (via the
>> added smp restart) a stop with the store status has to be finished
>> first.
>>
>> Correct handling of this in KVM/QEMU will need some thought and time.
>
> do I understand correctly that you are here "fixing" the test by not
> triggering the KVM bug? Shouldn't we try to trigger as many bugs as
> possible instead?
This is not a bug, it's missing code :-)
We trigger a higher number of bugs by running tests and this workaround
does exactly that by letting Thomas use the smp test in the CI again.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> s390x/smp.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
>> index b0ece491..32f284a2 100644
>> --- a/s390x/smp.c
>> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
>> @@ -102,12 +102,15 @@ static void test_stop_store_status(void)
>> lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
>> smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
>> mb();
>> + report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
>> + /* For the cpu to be started it should have finished storing
>> */
>> + smp_cpu_restart(1);
>> report(lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore,
>> "prefix"); report(lc->grs_sa[15], "stack");
>> - report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
>> report_prefix_pop();
>>
>> report_prefix_push("stopped");
>> + smp_cpu_stop(1);
>> lc->prefix_sa = 0;
>> lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
>> smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 14:15 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 14:21 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:08 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-09 16:14 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-02-09 16:19 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:42 ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 16:55 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a361e674-fa78-8c06-0583-29f8989d5493@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox