From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Klaus-Dieter Wacker <kdwacker@de.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drivers: s390: Move static and inline before return type
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 20:04:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a61fa6d0-9e34-adc4-bc1b-5e5abf1f64cc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170706122539.GJ3217@osiris>
On 07/06/2017 02:25 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 03:57:19AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:29 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:02:21PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> Make the code like the rest of the kernel.
>> []
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.cqq
>> []
>>>> @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ static int qeth_l3_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>>>> return rc;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -int inline qeth_l3_get_cast_type(struct qeth_card *card, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> +inline int qeth_l3_get_cast_type(struct qeth_card *card, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> {
>>>
>>> Actually the function could be made static, and "inline" should be removed,
>>> considering the large function body.
>>
>> I agree to a certain extent.
>>
>> It's only used once and it looks like Klaus-Dieter Wacker
>> just missed adding static to this function.
>>
>> $ git log --stat -p -1 ce73e10ee0cb6
>> commit ce73e10ee0cb6cde1c5075a2803da0f0eb5b2324
>> Author: Klaus-Dieter Wacker <kdwacker@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> But it also looks like inline is too often used in several
>> drivers/s390/net/*.c files, where most of those static inline
>> functions are only used once.
>>
>> $ git grep -w inline drivers/s390/net/*.c | wc -l
>> 42
>>
>> Maybe inline removals should be a separate pass for all those.
>
> Yes, Ursula or Julian can address this if they care.
>
true, no shortage of inline in s390/net. I'll see about spending a few
OCD cycles on it...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 20:02 [PATCH 00/18] treewide: Move storage class before return type Joe Perches
2017-07-05 20:02 ` [PATCH 12/18] drivers: s390: Move static and inline " Joe Perches
2017-07-06 10:29 ` Heiko Carstens
2017-07-06 10:57 ` Joe Perches
2017-07-06 12:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2017-07-06 18:04 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a61fa6d0-9e34-adc4-bc1b-5e5abf1f64cc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kdwacker@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox