public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix latent guest entry/exit bugs
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHeHilsi8-Tr9_1D@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708092742.104309-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 07:27:40PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> In [0], the guest_{enter,exit}_irqoff() helpers were deprecated, in favour
> of guest_timing_{enter,exit}_irqoff() and
> guest_context_{enter,exit}_irqoff(). This was to fix a number of latent
> guest entry/exit bugs, relating to the enabling of interrupts during an
> RCU extended quiescent state, instrumentation code, and correct handling
> of lockdep and tracing.
> 
> However, while arm64, mips, riscv and x86 have been migrated to the new
> helpers, s390 hasn't been. There was an initial attempt at [1] to do this,
> but that didn't work for reasons discussed at [2].
> 
> Since then, Claudio Imbrenda has reworked much of the interrupt handling.
> Moving interrupt handling into vcpu_post_run() avoids the issues in [2],
> so we can now move to the new helpers.

Nice!

> I've rebased Mark's patches from [1]. kvm-unit-tests, the kvm selftests,
> and IBM's internal test suites pass under debug_defconfig.

I took a quick look at this and Claudio's preparatory work, and this all
looks like what I was hoping for back in one of the replies to [2]:

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/YerRbhqvJ5nEcQYT@FVFF77S0Q05N/

I am not aware of any additional problems, and this all looks good to
me. Thanks for picking this up!

Mark.

> These patches do introduce some overhead - in my testing, a few of the
> tests in the kvm-unit-tests exittime test suite appear 6-11% slower, but
> some noticeable overhead may be unavoidable (we introduce a new function
> call and the irq entry/exit paths change a bit).
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220201132926.3301912-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220119105854.3160683-7-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/a4a26805-3a56-d264-0a7e-60bed1ada9f3@linux.ibm.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241022120601.167009-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Mark Rutland (2):
>   entry: Add arch_in_rcu_eqs()
>   KVM: s390: Rework guest entry logic
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/entry-common.h | 10 ++++++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |  3 ++
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c             | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c                 | 17 ++++------
>  include/linux/entry-common.h         | 16 +++++++++
>  kernel/entry/common.c                |  3 +-
>  6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.50.0

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-16 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08  9:27 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix latent guest entry/exit bugs Andrew Donnellan
2025-07-08  9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] entry: Add arch_in_rcu_eqs() Andrew Donnellan
2025-07-11 13:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-08  9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: Rework guest entry logic Andrew Donnellan
2025-07-09  9:22 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: Fix latent guest entry/exit bugs Janosch Frank
2025-07-16 11:05 ` Mark Rutland [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHeHilsi8-Tr9_1D@J2N7QTR9R3 \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox