public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: 18255117159@163.com, bhelgaas@google.com, helgaas@kernel.org,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
	kwilczynski@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix endianness issues in pci_bus_read_config()
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:53:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIu7uO4NOanxMfAO@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731173858.1173442-1-gbayer@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 07:38:58PM +0200, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> Simple pointer-casts to map byte and word reads from PCI config space
> into dwords (i.e. u32) produce unintended results on big-endian systems.
> Add the necessary adjustments under compile-time switch
> CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN.
> 
> pci_bus_read_config() was just introduced with
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250716161203.83823-2-18255117159@163.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Sorry to spill this endianness aware code into drivers/pci, feel free to
> suggest a cleaner approach. This has fixed the issues seen on s390 systems

PCI is little-endian.  On big-endian systems, the endianness conversion
of Config Space accesses happens transparently in the struct pci_ops
->read() and ->write() callbacks.  E.g. on s390, zpci_cfg_load() and
zpci_cfg_store() call le64_to_cpu() and cpu_to_le64(), respectively.

We do not want to mess with endianness in the PCI core, so this isn't
a proper fix IMO.

A viable approach might be to turn pci_bus_read_config() into a macro
in include/linux/pci.h which calls the byte/word/dword variant based
on sizeof(*val) or something like that.

But at this point, with the merge window already open, it's probably
better to drop the pci/capability-search topic branch from the pull
request and retry in the next cycle.

> Since this is still sitting in the a pull-request for upstream,
> I'm not sure if this warrants a Fixes: tag.

In cases like this, do include a Fixes tag but no stable designation.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4e10bea3aa91ee721bb40e9388e8f72f930908fe.camel@linux.ibm.com>
2025-07-31 17:38 ` [PATCH] PCI: Fix endianness issues in pci_bus_read_config() Gerd Bayer
2025-07-31 18:39   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-31 19:01     ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-01  8:18       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01  9:25         ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01  9:47           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01 10:06             ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 10:54               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-01 11:30                 ` Gerd Bayer
2025-08-01 16:54                   ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 18:08                     ` Keith Busch
2025-08-02 15:23                       ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-02 15:40                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-04  3:06                   ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04  8:03                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-08-04  8:25                       ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04 10:09                     ` Gerd Bayer
2025-08-12 14:44                       ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-13  7:47                         ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-08-13  7:50                           ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-04 14:33                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-04 15:04                       ` Hans Zhang
2025-08-01 16:47                 ` Hans Zhang
2025-07-31 18:53   ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-08-01  7:52   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIu7uO4NOanxMfAO@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox