public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, "C. Erastus Toe" <ctoe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: s390/nospec: add an option to use thunk-extern
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:16:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad6a926e-eed1-a5e2-9f8b-0ea1599bbaed@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.thread-d13b6c.your-ad-here.call-01656331067-ext-4899@work.hours>

On 6/27/22 8:50 AM, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> sorry for late reply.
> 
>> I couldn't find the upstream patch post for 1d2ad084800e ("s390/nospec:
>> add an option to use thunk-extern"), so replying off-list here.  Feel
>> free to cc the appropriate list.
>>
>> Regarding this change, as I understand it, when CONFIG_EXPOLINE_EXTERN=y
>> out-of-tree kernel modules will need to link against
>> arch/s390x/lib/expoline.o, right?
>>
>> And if so, shouldn't the top level 'prepare_modules' target create
>> expoline.o for this purpose?
> 
> Thanks for bringing this up. I definitely missed out-of-tree kernel modules
> build case without a prebuilt kernel. On the other hand this post-linking
> trick is a rip off from powerpc:
> 
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += arch/powerpc/lib/crtsavres.o
> 
> So, now I wonder why powerpc doesn't have crtsavres.o in 'prepare_modules'.
> 
> Anyhow, below is couple of patches to consider. The first one is
> meant to be backportable, as the second one requires 4efd417f298b.
> 
> I had to move expoline.S to a separate directory to be able to call into
> its Makefile for 'prepare_modules' and avoid warnings for other targets
> defined in the same Makefile. Not sure if there are better kbuild tricks
> I could use. Another option I thought about is to keep expoline.S where
> it is and add a condition into that Makefile:
> expoline_prepare: prepare0
> 	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/s390/lib expoline_prepare=1 arch/s390/lib/expoline.o
> 
> arch/s390/lib/Makefile:
> # first target defined
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_EXTERN) += expoline.o
> ifndef expoline_prepare
> # ...other targets...
> 
> Vasily Gorbik (2):
>   s390/nospec: build expoline.o for modules_prepare target
>   s390/nospec: remove unneeded header includes
> 
>  arch/s390/Makefile                      | 8 +++++++-
>  arch/s390/include/asm/nospec-insn.h     | 2 --
>  arch/s390/lib/Makefile                  | 3 ++-
>  arch/s390/lib/expoline/Makefile         | 3 +++
>  arch/s390/lib/{ => expoline}/expoline.S | 0
>  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/s390/lib/expoline/Makefile
>  rename arch/s390/lib/{ => expoline}/expoline.S (100%)
> 

Thanks, Vasily.  We'll test these with OOT and the original gitlab
pipeline where we spotted potential issue with packaging and report back.

-- 
Joe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8417373c-9dba-54bd-ce08-2d36d0a2af04@redhat.com>
2022-06-07 17:26 ` Fwd: s390/nospec: add an option to use thunk-extern Joe Lawrence
2022-06-27 12:50   ` Vasily Gorbik
2022-06-27 12:50     ` [PATCH 1/2] s390/nospec: build expoline.o for modules_prepare target Vasily Gorbik
2022-06-27 12:50     ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/nospec: remove unneeded header includes Vasily Gorbik
2023-03-16 11:14       ` Jiri Slaby
2023-03-16 11:28         ` [PATCH] s390: reintroduce expoline dependence to scripts Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2023-03-21 21:19           ` Vasily Gorbik
2023-03-17 10:58         ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/nospec: remove unneeded header includes Masahiro Yamada
2023-03-17 11:17         ` Vasily Gorbik
2023-03-17 11:32           ` Jiri Slaby
2023-03-17 23:36           ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-06-29 15:16     ` Joe Lawrence [this message]
     [not found]       ` <CAPQ7N1RFyZRCJZc84UxjSQj44ksa6f6ib5B=dVwoqMU9_=s8QA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-01 21:39         ` s390/nospec: add an option to use thunk-extern Joe Lawrence
2022-07-17 13:11           ` Sumanth Korikkar
2022-08-17 13:59             ` Joe Lawrence

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad6a926e-eed1-a5e2-9f8b-0ea1599bbaed@redhat.com \
    --to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=ctoe@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox