Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: Idle time accounting improvements

[Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>]

Le Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 09:55:00AM +0200, Heiko Carstens a écrit :
> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 04:01:25PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > This series is on top of Frederic Weisbecker's idle cpu time accounting
> > refactor series [1][2].
> > 
> > This is supposed to improve s390 idle time accounting, and brings it
> > back to the state it was before arch_cpu_idle_time() was removed from
> > s390 [3].
> > 
> > In result all cpu time accounting is done by the s390 architecture backend
> > again, instead of having a mix of architecure specific and common code
> > accounting (common code: idle, s390 architecture: everything else).
> 
> Thomas, Peter, Frederic, any objections to this series? The third patch
> touches common code, so I'd like to get an ACK for that.
> 
> If there is agreement, this could go either via tip tree's timers/nohz branch
> (series applies cleanly), or via s390, after the nohz branch has been merged
> upstream.

Looks all good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

I guess ideally it should go via s390. Any chance you can push this to this
merge window right after tip:timers/nohz is merged?

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs