Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: hexlabsecurity@proton.me, Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
	Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Raspl <raspl@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] net/smc: bound the receive length to the RMB in smc_rx_recvmsg()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:03:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajQWxQZXzM2J8kaZ@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614-b4-disp-edd64be9-v3-2-551fa514257e@proton.me>

On 2026-06-14 03:23:31, Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay wrote:
>From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
>conn->bytes_to_rcv is accumulated in the receive tasklet from the peer's
>producer cursor:
>
>	diff_prod = smc_curs_diff(rmb_desc->len, &prod_old, &prod_new);
>	atomic_add(diff_prod, &conn->bytes_to_rcv);
>
>smc_curs_diff()'s differing-wrap branch returns (size - old.count) +
>new.count, which exceeds rmb_desc->len for a forged producer cursor and
>accumulates across CDC messages, so bytes_to_rcv can grow past the RMB
>(and across many messages can overflow the signed counter negative).
>smc_rx_recvmsg() reads it as the number of readable bytes and performs a
>wrap-around copy whose second chunk (copylen - first_chunk, read from
>ring offset 0) is never re-bounded to rmb_desc->len, reading past the
>RMB into adjacent kernel memory and disclosing it to the peer.

Hi Bryam,

Once we validate the CDC message at the input boundary (as in the
previous patch), bytes_to_rcv can never exceed rmb_desc->len, so
this check becomes unreachable. So I don't think this patch is needed.

Best regards,
Dust


>
>Bound the readable count to rmb_desc->len where it is consumed, treating
>a negative (sign-overflowed) value as out of range too, so the copy
>length can never exceed the ring.  This enforces the documented
>0 <= bytes_to_rcv <= rmb_desc->len invariant at the consumer, where it
>is race-free against the producer update that runs in the receive
>tasklet.
>
>Fixes: 952310ccf2d8 ("smc: receive data from RMBE")
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>---
> net/smc/smc_rx.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_rx.c b/net/smc/smc_rx.c
>index c1d9b923938d..f461cf10b085 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_rx.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_rx.c
>@@ -442,6 +442,18 @@ int smc_rx_recvmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg,
> 		/* initialize variables for 1st iteration of subsequent loop */
> 		/* could be just 1 byte, even after waiting on data above */
> 		readable = smc_rx_data_available(conn, peeked_bytes);
>+		/* bytes_to_rcv is accumulated from the peer's wire-controlled
>+		 * producer cursor; a forged cursor can drive it past the RMB,
>+		 * or overflow the signed accumulator to a negative value across
>+		 * many CDC messages (which a plain "> len" check would miss
>+		 * before the size_t cast below turns it huge).  Bound it to the
>+		 * RMB in either case so the wrap-around copy cannot run past
>+		 * rmb_desc->len.  This enforces the documented
>+		 * 0 <= bytes_to_rcv <= rmb_desc->len invariant at the consumer,
>+		 * race-free against the producer update in the receive tasklet.
>+		 */
>+		if (readable < 0 || readable > conn->rmb_desc->len)
>+			readable = conn->rmb_desc->len;
> 		splbytes = atomic_read(&conn->splice_pending);
> 		if (!readable || (msg && splbytes)) {
> 			if (splbytes)
>
>-- 
>2.43.0
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-14  8:23 [PATCH v3 0/3] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] net/smc: bound the wire-controlled producer cursor to the RMB Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-15  8:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18 14:29   ` Dust Li
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] net/smc: bound the receive length to the RMB in smc_rx_recvmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-15  8:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18 16:03   ` Dust Li [this message]
2026-06-14  8:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/smc: bound the send length to the send buffer in smc_tx_sendmsg() Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-18 16:08   ` Dust Li
2026-06-17 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] net/smc: bound wire-controlled CDC cursors against the local buffers Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajQWxQZXzM2J8kaZ@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox